GEA_Presentation
-
Upload
minh-nguyen -
Category
Documents
-
view
46 -
download
0
Transcript of GEA_Presentation
Minh Nguyen
April 10, 2014
Well Design Improves
Hydrocarbon Recovery of
Carbonate Reservoir Analog Model
1
> 50%
So Why Carbonates?
2
Why Analog Model?
3
La Molata Field Area
(Franseen and Goldstein, 2011)
La Molata Outcrops in SE Spain
…20+ years of research work on this area
4
Geology & Analog Models
(Franseen and Goldstein, 2011)
5
Objectives
How efficient would a vertical well drilled updip be in draining the reservoir?
How much oil would be left behind because of progrades and lateral pinchouts of reefs?
Would a horizontal well be required and should it be along strike or downdip to intersect the maximum number of progrades?
6
Well Design Scenarios
7
Pair 1 Pair 2Pair 3
Simulation Results
8
Pair 1 (I1-P1)
Pair 2 (I2-P2)
Pair 3 (I3-P3)
But Why Pair 1?!?
But Wait…
9
Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 3
Connected Volumes
10
Why Pair 1 recovers the most…
11
Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 3
Zones 3, 4, 5, 6
Zones 5, 6
Zones 5, 6, 7
Well Design Scenarios – Pair 1
12
Pair 1 Horizontal wells – Pair 1
Pair 1 – with added lateral branches
Zones 3, 4, 5, 6
Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Zones 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Simulation Results
13
Vertical Pair 1
Horizontal Pair 1
Added lateral branches
ConclusionAnswered all the questions asked by geologists
Developed a method of building connected volumes to identify drilling targets
Optimized wells for better recovery of this analog model
Further study can be done through completion optimization, drilling economics
14
AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the funding support from ExxonMobil and KU Tertiary Oil Recovery Program.
We also thank Schlumberger for software donation to make this research possible.
15
16
Questions or Comments?