8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
1/78
Alternative resolution by mediation of consumerdisputes related to financial services in Romania
- within the framework of the practices of the EU Member States -
Professor Carmen Blan Ph.D.
Academy of Economic StudiesFaculty of Marketing
Bucharest, Romania
Katowice, 7 March 2011
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
2/78
Page 2
CONTENTS
Section Page
I. The importance of the topic 3
II. Definition of ADR 5
III. Types of ADR procedures 10
IV. Mediation in the EU: the regulatory framework 15
V. Mediation in the sector of financial services in the EU Member States 31
VI. Mediation in Romania: the regulatory framework 42
VII. Mediation in the sector of financial services in Romania 52
VIII. Conclusions 71IX. Recommendations 75
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
3/78
Page 3
Section I
The importance of the topic
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
4/78
Page 4
The importance of the topic
Romania: increasing number ofcustomer complaints relative to the contractualrelationships with financial institutions, especially banks
NACP received:
4,000 complaints relative to the banking services in 2008
3,000 complaints in 2009
out of which 650 have been submitted to courts
Most complaints referred to:
unjustified increases in the bank commissions and in the interest rates for creditcontracts that have been already signed by banks and customers
other modifications of the clauses after the conclusion of the contract and withoutcustomer acknowledgement and agreement
EU Member States: the current trend to develop and implement ways ofalternative dispute resolution that represent more convenient alternatives for customers in terms of time and financial
resources, in comparison with the classical judicial system
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
5/78
Page 5
Section II
Definitions of ADR
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
6/78
Page 6
Various definitions
Numerous international debates
Definitions vary on a continuum between very narrow to very broad
perspectives
On one side:
there is a strict technical meaning that refers only to the non-judicialdevices that may be used forout-of-court dispute resolution
On the other side:
there is a broad definition according to which alternative dispute resolutionrefers to non-judicial as well as tojudicial devices that are an alternative tothe ordinary or traditional procedures
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
7/78
Page 7
Study commissioned
by the European Commission: 2007 (1/2)
Stuyck, J. et al., 2007.An analysis and evaluation of alternative means ofconsumer redress other than redress through ordinary judicial proceedings.Final report. Leuven: Study Centre for Consumer Law Centre for European
Economic Law at the Law Faculty of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium),17 January 2007.
Study made in 28 countries:
25 Member States of the EU Australia, Canada and the USA
ADR may be defined as a continuum between:
no actionand
reliance on ordinary court procedures
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
8/78
Page 8
Study commissioned
by the European Commission: 2007 (2/2)
Five categories of mechanisms to obtain redress (other thanindividual redress through ordinary court procedures):
a) direct negotiation (between consumer and the merchant)b) mediation and arbitration
c) small claim procedures
d) collective actions for damages
e) injunctive relief
The report has revealed that each analyzed country has a unique mixof ADR processes and techniques
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
9/78
Page 9
Most recent study on ADR in the EU: 2009
Alleweldt, F. et al., 2009. Study on the use of alternative disputeresolution in the European Union. Final report. Berlin: Civic Consultingof the Consumer Policy Evaluation Consortium (CPEC), 16 October 2009.
The study referred to:
characteristics and use of the ADR schemes
procedures and functioning of the ADR schemes conformity with EC recommendations and the best practices.
Majorstrengths of the report:
detailed perspective of the ADR schemes applied by each Member State
data about all the ADR bodies, by economic sector
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
10/78
Page 10
Section III
Types of ADR procedures
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
11/78
Page 11
Types of ADR procedures (1/4)
Criterion:
type of involvement of the third party
Three distinct categories of ADR procedures:
a) conciliation or mediation
b) recommendation and binding decision
c) arbitration
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
12/78
Page 12
Types of ADR procedures:
a) conciliation or mediation (2/4)
The 3rd party:
may help the parties in dispute
without formally expressing an opinion on the possible solutions to thedispute
The parties: are invited to start or continue a dialogue and to avoid confrontation
based on consensus, the parties themselves identify the personalizedsolution adapted to the nature of the dispute
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
13/78
Page 13
Types of ADR procedures:
b) recommendation and binding decision (3/4)
The 3rd party:
identifies a solution and presents it to the parties in dispute
Within this ADR category, there are two possible types of solutions:recommendation and binding decision
b1) Recommendation
The parties in dispute are free to accept or not a recommendation made by thethird party.
A consumer who is not satisfied with the recommendation may go to court
Ex: consumer complaint boards in the Scandinavian countries
b2) Binding decision
The decision of the third party is binding on the tradesperson
Such decisions are made by third parties such as ombudsmen (in banking andinsurance sectors)
Similarly, the consumer who is dissatisfied with the decision may go to court
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
14/78
Page 14
Types of ADR procedures:
c) arbitration (4/4)
The 3rd ADR category resembles the court procedures
The decisions made by an arbitrator:
are binding on both parties
they have the status ofenforceable decisions and consequently thesettled dispute cannot be taken to court
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
15/78
Page 15
Section IV
Mediation in the EU: the regulatory framework
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
16/78
Page 16
Commission Recommendation
of 4 April 2001 (1/8)
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001 on the principles forout-of-court bodies involved in the consensual resolution of
consumer disputes. C(2001) 1016, Official Journal, L 109, 19/04/2001,Brussels, 4 April 2001, pp. 56-61.
Principles:
a) Impartiality
b) Transparency
c) Effectiveness
d) Fairness
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
17/78
Page 17
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001:
a) impartiality (2/8)
Impartiality should be guaranteed by ensuring that those responsiblefor the procedure:
a) are appointed for a fixed term and shall not be liable to be relieved fromtheir duties without just cause
b) have no perceived oractual conflict of interest with either party
c) provide information about theirimpartiality and competence to bothparties prior to the commencement of the procedure
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
18/78
Page 18
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001:
b) transparency (3/8)
1. The transparency of the procedure should be guaranteed
2. Information about the contact details, functioning and availability of the procedure shouldbe readily available to the parties in simple terms so that they can access and retain itbefore submitting a dispute
3. In particular, information should be made available on:a) how the procedure will operate, the types of disputes that can be dealt by it and any
restrictions on its operationb) the rules governing any preliminary requirements that the parties may have to meet, and otherprocedural rules, notably those concerning the operation of the procedure and the languages inwhich the procedure will be conducted
c) the cost, if any, to be borne by the parties
d) the timetable applicable to the procedure, particularly with regard to the type of dispute inquestion;
e) any substantive rules that may be applicable (legal provisions, industry best practice,considerations of equity, codes of conduct)
f) the role of the procedure in bringing about the resolution of a dispute
g) the status of any agreed solution for resolving the dispute
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
19/78
Page 19
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001:
b) transparency (4/8)
4. Any agreed solution for resolving the dispute by the parties should:
be recorded on a durable medium
clearly state the terms and the grounds on which it is based
That record should be made available to both parties
5. Information on the performance of the procedure should be madepublicly available, including:
a) the number and types of complaints it has received and their outcome
b) the time taken to resolve complaints
c) any systematic problems arising from complaints
d) the compliance record, if known, of agreed solutions
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
20/78
Page 20
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001:
c) effectiveness (5/8)
1. The effectiveness of the procedure should be guaranteed
2. It should be easily accessible and available to both parties
for instance by electronic means, irrespective of where the parties aresituated
3. The procedure should be eitherfree of charge to consumers, or anynecessary costs should be both proportionate to the amount indispute and moderate.
4. The parties should have access to the procedure without beingobliged to use a legal representative
nonetheless the parties should not be prevented from being represented orassisted by a third party at any or all stages of the procedure.
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
21/78
Page 21
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001:
c) effectiveness (6/8)
5. Once a dispute has been submitted it should be dealt with in theshortest possible time commensurate with the nature of the dispute.
The body responsible for the procedure should periodically review itsprogress to ensure the parties' dispute is being dealt with expeditiously andappropriately
6. The conduct of the parties should be reviewed by the body responsiblefor the procedure to ensure they are committed to seeking a proper,fair and timely resolution of the dispute
If one party's conduct is unsatisfactory, both parties should be informed in
order to enable them to consider whether to continue the dispute resolutionprocedure
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
22/78
Page 22
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001:
d) fairness (7/8)
1. The fairness of the procedure should be guaranteed
a) the parties should be informed of theirright to refuse to participate or to withdrawfrom the procedure at any time and access the legal system or other out-of-court
redress mechanisms at any stage if they are dissatisfied with the performance oroperation of the procedure
b) both parties should be able to freely and easily submit any arguments, informationor evidence relevant to their case on a confidential basis to the procedure unlessagreement has been given by the parties to pass such information to the other party.
If at any stage, the 3rd party suggests possible solutions for resolving thedispute, then each party should have the opportunity to present their viewpointand comment on any argument, information or evidence presented by the otherparty
c) both parties should be encouraged to fully cooperate with the procedure, in particular
by providing any information necessary for a fair resolution of the disputed) prior to the parties agreeing to a suggested solution for resolving the dispute, they
should be allowed a reasonable period of time to consider this solution
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
23/78
Page 23
Commission Recommendation of 4 April 2001:
d) fairness (8/8)
2. The consumer should be informed in clear und understandablelanguage, before agreeing to a suggested solution, of the followingpoints:
a) he has the choice as to whether or not to agree to the suggestedsolution
b) the suggested solution may be less favorable than an outcomedetermined by a court applying legal rules
c) before agreeing to or rejecting the suggested solution he has the right toseek independent advice
d) use of the procedure does not preclude the option ofreferring his disputeto another out-of-court dispute resolution mechanism, in particularwithin the scope of Recommendation 98/257/EC, or of seeking legal redressthrough his own judicial system
e) the status of an agreed solution
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
24/78
Page 24
European Code of Conduct for Mediators: 2004
(1/3)
In 2004, the Commission expressed its support for a European Code ofConduct for Mediators and put forward a proposal for a directive on
mediation The code of conduct:
was developed by a group of stakeholders with the assistance of theEuropean Commission
was officially presented on 2 July 2004, on the occasion of a conferenceorganized in Brussels
in the preliminary stage, the Code must have only the character of aninformal document, not being formally adopted by an EU institution
Individual mediators and organizations may voluntarily subscribe to thecode
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
25/78
Page 25
Establishes a set of principles to be applied in civil and commercial mattersby the individuals and organizations that subscribe to it
Mediation:
= any structured process, however named or referred to, whereby two or more parties toa dispute attempt by themselves, on a voluntary basis, to reach an agreement on thesettlement of their dispute with the assistance of a third person (mediator)
The text of the code refers to:
a) competence, fees of mediators and promotion of their services
b) independence and impartialityc) the mediation agreement, process and settlement
d) confidentiality
European Code of Conduct for Mediators: 2004
(2/3)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
26/78
Page 26
European Code of Conduct for Mediators: 2004
(3/3)
The independence of the mediatoris an aspect of utmost importance
The mediator has the obligation to disclose any circumstances that maygenerate a conflict of interests
any personal or business relationship with one or more of the parties
any financial or other interest, direct or indirect, in the outcome of the mediation
the mediator, or a member of his firm, having acted in any capacity other than mediatorfor one or more of the parties.
Upon request from the parties and within the limits of his/her competence, themediatormust inform the parties relative to:
the manner in which they may formalize the agreement the possibilities for making the agreement enforceable
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
27/78
Page 27
Directive 2008/52/EC (1/4)
Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercialmatters, Official Journal, L 136 , 24/05/2008, pp. 3-8.
Main goal of the Directive;
to facilitate the access to ADR
to promote the amicable settlement of disputes by: encouraging the use of mediation
ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicialproceedings
The provisions of the Directive refer to the cross-border disputes However, Member States may apply these provisions to the internal mediation
processes
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
28/78
Page 28
Directive 2008/52/EC (2/4)
The definition of the concept of mediation
is similarto that presented in the Code of Conduct for Mediators
The mediation process may take place due to one of the following reasons: the initiative of the parties
a suggestion or order of a court
the provisions of the law of an EU Member State
The Directive provisions referred to aspects such as:a) ensuring the quality of mediation
b) recourse to mediation
c) enforceability of agreements resulting from mediation
d) confidentiality of mediation
e) effect of mediation on limitation and prescription periods
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
29/78
Page 29
Directive 2008/52/EC:Key provisions (3/4)
Parties may render enforceable the agreement concluded followingmediation, giving it a status similarto that of a court judgment
The enforceability is obtained by: judicial approval
notarial certification
The access of parties to justice is preserved should mediation notsucceed
The provisions relative to the periods of limitation and prescriptionensure that parties are not prevented to go to court
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
30/78
Page 30
Directive 2008/52/EC (4/4)
An aspect that requires further debate:
the independence of mediators
While the Code of Conduct for Mediators has dedicated a substantialparagraph to it, the Directive did not address this issue
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
31/78
Page 31
Section V
Mediation in the sector of financial servicesin the EU Member States
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
32/78
Page 32
Mediation schemesin the EU Member States (1/2)
There is a diversity of mediation schemes for the commercialdisputes, in general, and for the financial service sector, in particular.
FIN-NET (Financial Services Complaints Network)
Established by the EU
Goal:
to facilitate the access of consumers to ADR systems in the field offinancial services
Complements the EEJ-Net
FIN-NET is a communitywide network that links the national ADR schemes
relative to financial services This initiative may have a favorable impact on cross-border disputes
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
33/78
Page 33
Mediation schemesin the EU Member States (2/2)
No single definition of mediation accepted in all the countries
The types of outcomes provided by the ADR schemes that include intheir denomination the word mediation vary
From: consensual agreement
To: non-binding recommendations / decisions
Consensual agreement, as a distinct outcome among others, may bespecific not only to the schemes that include the word mediation in their
denomination, but also to other schemes
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
34/78
Page 34
ADR schemes for mediationin financial services (1/2)
In the sector of financial services, ADR schemes that include in theirdenomination the word mediation have been established in thefollowing EU Member States:
Belgium
France
Italy
Luxembourg
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
35/78
Page 35
ADR schemes for mediationin financial services (2/2)
Few of these mediation schemes in financial services have been notified to theEuropean Commission (EC)
This situation is similar to the overall trend (irrespective of economic sector), in the EUMember States
750 ADR schemes relevant to business-to-consumer disputes wereidentified, out of which only about 60% are notified to the EC
In the sector offinancial services:
18 mediation schemes were identified
out of which only 7 (respectively 26%) are notified to the EC
Reasons
many are in their initial stage of development
there is no perceived benefit of the notification
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
36/78
Page 36
Mediation schemesfocused on financial services and notified to the EC (1/2)
n/ax---noOOPbInvestor and Mediation Office of the Securities
Market Board (CMVM)
91-180
xx--51-100I & PbVO
(Pb & I)Centro de Informao, Mediao e Arbitragem deSeguros Automvel (CIMASA)
PORTUGAL
n/ax--xnon/an/an/aACA/ULC Mdiateur en Assurances
LUXEMBOURG
31-90x--->500IVPvConciliatore Bancario Finanziario
ITALY
31-90---xnon/an/aPbMdiateur du Ministre del'conomie, des Finances et de l'Industrie
31-90---xnoIVPvMdiateur de la Fdration Franaise des Socits
d'Assurances
FRACE
91-180
---xnoIVPvService de Mdiation Banques-Crdit-Placements
BELGIUM
CADBoB&C
DBoB
NbR
Ave-ragedura-tion in2008(days)
Outcomeof the procedureAverage
cost forconsumers
(Euros)
Fun-ding
Adhe-rence
by theindustry
Natureof the
schemeName of the mediation scheme
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
37/78
Page 37
Mediation schemesfocused on financial services and notified to the EC (2/2)
Source: Alleweldt, F. et al., 2009. Study on the use of alternative disputeresolution in the European Union. Final report. Berlin: Civic Consulting of theConsumer Policy Evaluation Consortium (CPEC), 16 October 2009
Note:
NbR = non-binding recommendation
DBoB = decision binding on business only
DBoB&C = decision binding on business & consumer
CA = consensual agreement mediated by scheme Pv = private
Pb = public
V = voluntary
I = industry O = other
n/a = data not available
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
38/78
Page 38
Mediation schemes not notified to the EC(in the sector of financial services)
Exist in:
France
Mdiateur de BNP Paribas
Mdiateur de lAssociation Franaise des Socits Financires
Mdiateur de la Fdration Bancaire Franaise
Mdiateur du Groupe Crdit Agricole
Mdiateur de la Caisse des Dpts
Mdiateur de la Socit Gnrale
Mdiateur de la banque Le Crdit Lyonnais
Mdiateur du Groupe Caisse dpargne
Romania
Union of Banking Mediators Slovakia
Mediation Centre of the Slovenian Insurance Association
Mediation Centre of the Bank Association of Slovenia
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
39/78
Page 39
Outcomes of the mediation schemes
The mediation schemes existing in the EU Member States may be classifiedaccording to the outcome of the procedure
Mediation: Stricto sensu
refers to solutions based on the consensual agreement between the parties to thedispute.
However, practice shows that mediation schemes may also have as outcomes:
non-binding decisions (recommendations)
decisions binding on both parties
Many schemes provide a combination of possible outcomes
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
40/78
Page 40
Diversity of schemes and outcomes
Schemes focused on both mediation and arbitration
Example:
the Financial Services Complaints Institute (Kifid) from Netherlands
the outcome consists in consensual agreement between the parties to the disputeand decisions binding on both parties
Schemes that do not include in their denomination the word mediation andgenerate a mediated consensual agreement
Example: the ombudsman in the financial service sector
Outcomes: binding or non-binding solution and also consensual agreementmediated by the scheme
ABSL Service Insurance Ombudsman (in Belgium)
Financial Sector Supervisory Committee (in Luxembourg)
Insurance Ombudsman and Banking Ombudsman (in Poland)
Financial Service Ombudsman (in the United Kingdom)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
41/78
Page 41
Development stage of the ADR schemesthat lead to a mediated outcome
At present, the ADR schemes that lead to consensual agreement bymediation are in an early development stage
Most of the times, there is no strict frontierbetween mediation and othertypes of ADR schemes
Mediation may be provided by both:
schemes specialized in mediation
schemes focused on other ADR procedures applied in financial
services
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
42/78
Page 42
Section VI
Mediation in Romania: the regulatory framework
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
43/78
Page 43
Regulations
Law relative to mediation
2006: in Romania, the first law on mediation was adopted
Law no. 192 relative to mediation and the organization of the mediatorprofession
2009: this law was modified and completed by Law no. 370
Standard relative to the training of mediators
2007: the Standard relative to the training of mediators was approved by theCouncil of Mediation
2008: the Council of Mediation has modified the standard (Council ofMediation, 2008).
Code of Ethics and Professional Deontology of Mediators
2008: the Council of Mediation has adopted the code
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
44/78
Page 44
Law no. 192/2006modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009 (1/5)
Refers to:
the profession of mediator
the organization of the activity of mediators the rights and responsibilities of mediators
the mediation procedure
the mediation of family conflicts and of criminal causes
Article 1
Mediation is defined as a way to solve the conflicts on a conciliatory base,
with the support of a specialized third party as mediator, within a frameworkofneutrality, impartiality and confidentiality and with the free consent of theparties
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
45/78
Page 45
Law no. 192/2006modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009 (2/5)
The Romanian definition of mediation is in line with the content of theDirective 2008/52/EC
However, the definition provided by the Romanian law states thecondition of neutrality of the third party that provides assistance to theparties in dispute
This condition is not formally mentioned in the Directive 2008/52/EC
Nevertheless, the European Code of Conduct for Mediators that has onlyan informal value states as requirement the independence of mediators
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
46/78
Page 46
Law no. 192/2006modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009 (3/5)
Mediator: definition
A person trusted by the parties and that is able to facilitate the negotiations betweenthem and support them to solve the conflict through the identification of a mutually
convenient, efficient and sustainable solution
The mediator cannot impose a solution relative to the dispute between parties
The mediation process is based on the cooperation of the parties to the dispute
Profession of mediator
may be practiced only by the person that has obtained the quality of authorizedmediator
is compatible with the practice of other activities or professions.
authorized mediators are registered in the Table of Mediators that is drawn up by theCouncil of Mediation and published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I
L 192/2006
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
47/78
Page 47
Law no. 192/2006modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009 (4/5)
Relevance of the law to the commercial disputes
the provisions are also applicable to the conflicts in the field ofconsumer protection:
purchase of defective goods or services
non-observance of contractual clauses or warranties provided existence of abusive clauses within the contracts concluded between consumers and
economic operators
infringement of other rights stipulated by the national or EU legislation in the field ofconsumer protection
No special provisions relative to mediation in commercial law, even if it comprisesspecial provisions relative to mediation in civil law, in criminal law and family law
In Romania, similarly to the EU legislation, mediation of commercial matters is addressed by a lawthat also refers to the civil matters
Reasons:
common characteristics
present stage in the development of legislation on commercial litigations
L 192/2006
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
48/78
Page 48
Law no. 192/2006modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009 (5/5)
Council of Mediation
organizes the mediation activity in Romania
autonomous legal person of public interest with its headquarters in Bucharest
Main responsibilities of the council:
promotion of the mediation activity and representation of the interests of the authorizedmediators
development of training standards relative to mediation based on the international bestpractices
authorization of the initial and continuous professional training, as well as of thespecialization training
authorization of mediators
supervision of the compliance with the training standards in the field of mediation
development of the Code of Ethics and Professional Deontology
making proposals to improve regulation of mediation
C d f Ethi & P f i l D t l (1/2)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
49/78
Page 49
Code of Ethics & Professional Deontology (1/2)
Approved by the Council of Mediation
reflects the provisions of the Law no. 192/2006
The provisions of the code
meant to guarantee based on their free acceptance by mediators thefulfillment of the mediators mission
The non-compliance with the deontological norms specified by the code
incurs the application ofdisciplinary sanctions by the Council of Mediation
C d f Ethi & P f i l D t l (2/2)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
50/78
Page 50
Code of Ethics & Professional Deontology (2/2)
General principles to be applied by mediators
freedom of parties to apply to mediation and to make a decision
non-discrimination independence, neutrality and impartiality of the mediator
trust and moral integrity
professional secret, confidentiality
conflict of interests
fee setting
responsibility of mediators
incompatibilities quality of the mediation process
Authorized mediation:
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
51/78
Page 51
Authorized mediation:evolution stage in Romania
Early stage
The regulatory framework relative to mediation and mediator profession wasadopted very recently
The profession of mediatorwas legally created in 2006 Both civil matters and commercial matters are the object of the same provisions
relative to mediation and the organization of the profession of mediator
Less likely the development oflaws specialized in authorized mediation in thesector offinancial services, within the near future
Reasons:
the early stage in the development of authorized mediation
the existence of a set of legal provisions that refer generally to all the situations ofmediation in a non-specialized way make
The practice of mediation in financial services must evolve so that the need forspecial legal provisions to become significant in order to be addressed
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
52/78
Page 52
Section VII
Mediation in the sector of financial services in Romania
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
53/78
Page 53
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania(1/6)
Established on 11 November 2009
as body specialized in the sector of financial services
by some of the authorized mediators from the Table of Mediators
Goal
to promote mediation and to mediate conflicts and litigations from the banking,leasing and insurance sector
Basic principles of mediation applied by the UBMR
legality, neutrality, impartiality, confidentiality and mutual respect
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
54/78
Page 54
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania(2/6)
Romanian legal person ofprivate law
Professional non-profit body
The activities of the UBMR comply with Law no. 192/2006 modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009
norms and instructions of the Council of Mediation
code of conducts of the: American Bar Association (ABA)
Association for Conflict Resolution (ACR)
American Arbitration Association (AAA)
European Code of Conduct for Mediators Code of Ethics and Professional Deontology of Mediators from Romania
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
55/78
Page 55
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania(3/6)
The activity of UBMR includes among others:
making proposals for the improvement of the regulatory framework relative to conflict mediation inthe banking, leasing and insurance system
organization of a permanent dialog and good cooperation with institutions such as:
Council of Mediation
professional associations of authorized mediators
Romanian National Bank
Romanian Banking Association
Romanian Banking Institute commercial banks
Ministry of Justice
National Authority for Consumer Protection
Government of Romania and Parliament of Romania
Union of the Liberal Professions National Association of the Romanian Bars
Association of Business People
Association of Banks Customers
Ministry of Public Finance etc.
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
56/78
Page 56
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania(4/6)
The authorized mediators that are members of the UBMR may providemediation services in order to assist in solving conflicts such as:
a) conflicts claimed by customers
b) conflicts claimed by banks
c) conflicts between bank employees at all levels
d) other conflicts that do not refer to the relationships bank employee
customer and are under the incidence of the Law no. 192/2006
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
57/78
Page 57
U o o a g ed ato s o o a a(5/6)
Examples of conflicts claimed by customers (being either legal or naturalpersons):
incorrectly calculated interest rates
unjustified increase in the interest rates that were supposed to be fixed during the
contract period unjustified commissions
errors in processing transactions with cards
errors in processing online banking transactions
incomplete or unclear information
unauthorized operations in the accounts
banking frauds
unjustified registration as bad debtor with the Central of Banking Risks and with theCredit Bureau
abusive clauses inserted in the credit contracts no communication from the bank relative to the increase in the interest rate
changes in the clauses of the convention without the consultation and agreement ofcontractual parties and without registration in an additional act signed by bothparties
damages for customers due to the late processing of money orders etc.
Union of Banking Mediators from Romania
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
58/78
Page 58
g(6/6)
Examples of conflicts claimed by banks
non-payment with ill will by banks customers of their money debts to the bank
late payment after debt deadline by customers unjustified refusal of the customer to pay the interest and legally calculated
penalties
threatening, insulting, slandering or striking of bank employees by the debtor
customers denigration of bank in mass-media by customers
registration of unjustified complaints relative to banks with the National Authorityfor Consumer Protection and National Bank of Romania
Romanian Banking Association (1/2)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
59/78
Page 59
Romanian Banking Association (1/2)
Recognized the need for ADR schemes in the field offinancial services
Background study relative to the establishment of a bank ombudsman inRomania
suggested that an independent and effective Bank Ombudsman scheme be establishedmodeled after the European schemes analyzed by the study
December 2006: presented to the SPI Committee
July 2007: the documents approved by the SPI Committee
In 2008: the National Bank of Romania approved the proposal of the RBA relative to the creation
ofmediator bancar (banking mediator)
banking mediatorwill give verdicts, establishing whether the customer or the bank isright, in the case of a conflict
The RBA registered the brand Mediatorul Bancar with the State Office forInventions and Trademarks (SOIT)
Romanian Banking Association (2/2)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
60/78
Page 60
g ( )
The text of the feasibility study
was elaborated in English
referred in its entirety to the establishment of a banking ombudsman
All the information provided to the mass-media channels as well as thetrademark registered with OSIT use the term mediator bancar asequivalent translation to financial ombudsman
In fact, the project of RBA refers to a banking ombudsman, not to abanking mediator
The two concepts belong both to the ADR area
Ombudsman vs. mediator (1/6)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
61/78
Page 61
Both act as third parties
Experts make a clear distinction between ombudsman and mediator
The major reasons:a) role
b) type of outcome
c) neutrality, impartiality and confidentiality
d) choice of a mediator
e) research
Ombudsman vs. mediator:
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
62/78
Page 62
a) role (2/6)
Ombudsman
Role: to identify a solution under the form of a decision that is binding to thetradesperson
the consumer that is dissatisfied with the decision may go to court
Mediator
Role: to assist parties to identify themselves a mutually beneficial solution by dialogand cooperation
The mediatordoes not formally express and impose own opinion on the possiblesolution to the dispute
According to article 4(2) of the Law no. 192/2006 relative to mediation and to theprofession of mediator and modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009:
the mediatordoes not have decision powerrelative to the content of theagreement that will be reached by parties, but may guide them to verify thelegality of agreement (according to article 59)
Ombudsman vs. mediator:b) t f t (3/6)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
63/78
Page 63
b) type of outcome (3/6)
Mediator
assists parties in solving the conflict by means of obtaining a solution that is:
mutually beneficial to these parties efficient
sustainable
Article 1(2) of the law Law no. 192/2006 modified and completed by the
Law no. 370/2009
Ombudsman
is not responsible to ensure such characteristics of the outcome
Ombudsman vs. mediator:) t lit i ti lit d fid ti lit (4/6)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
64/78
Page 64
c) neutrality, impartiality and confidentiality (4/6)
Mediator
neutrality, impartiality and confidentiality are conditions to be fulfilled by mediators
According to article 1 of the Romanian Law no. 192/2006 modified and completed by the Law no.370/2009
must lead the mediation process in an impartial way and ensure a permanent balance betweenparties
Article 30(2) of the Romanian Law no. 192/2006 modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009
the obligation to keep the confidentiality of the information during the mediation activity as well as ofthe documents elaborated or submitted by parties during the mediation process, even after the
cessation of his/her function Article 32 of the Romanian Law no. 192/2006 modified and completed by the Law no. 370/2009
Ombudsman (as registered by RBA)
a financial ombudsman is a person that has a relationship with a bank, for example as employee,
collaborator or member of an association of banks may not be the mediator of a banking dispute
from the perspective of a mediator, the conflict of interests should be avoided, in order to ensure aprofessional and ethical assistance to the parties
Ombudsman vs. mediator:d) choice of a mediator (5/6)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
65/78
Page 65
d) choice of a mediator (5/6)
The parties may freely choose themselves the mediator
the mediator is not appointed by an institution or an association
The mediation is based on the trust placed by the parties in the mediator
Ombudsman vs. mediator:e) research (6/6)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
66/78
Page 66
e) research (6/6)
Mediator
does not make research relative to the dispute, like an ombudsman
Ombudsman
makes research
RBA & UBMR (1/2)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
67/78
Page 67
If no changes will be made in the terminology used (more specificallyin the translation of the term ombudsman from English to Romanian) bythe RBA specialists, there is a lot of room for errors among customers and
all those who are not very knowledgeable of ADR
The president of RBA estimated that until the end of 2008, the banking
mediator may become functional However, the intentions of RBA and the efforts deployed to set up a mediation
entity did not materialize until December 2009 when the UBMR was created
RBA & UBMR (2/2)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
68/78
Page
68
18 January 2010: the board of directors (BoD) of the RBA has published a two-paragraph press release on its site
relative to the own project relative to mediation and to the UBMR
the BoD acknowledges the customers (natural or legal persons) of the credit institutions,as well as the media channels, that:
the recently created UBMR is not the result of the project supported by RBAand by the banking community
RBA continues its efforts to set up an entity with mediation responsibilities in thebanking field that will be accepted and recognized by the banking community
the level of professionalism and knowledge of the banking activities of the entityplanned by RBA will represent a warranty for a competent and pertinent analysisof the causes to be mediated and will ensure correct decisions that will meet the
expectations of those who apply to the services of this entity.
Mediation clause
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
69/78
Page
69
At present, almost all commercial contracts do not include a mediation clause
The Center of Mediation of the Commercial Disputes with the Chamber ofCommerce and Industry of Romania and of Bucharest
has suggested two possible formulations of such a clause:
a) the former refers to a contract
Every misunderstanding, dispute or divergence relative to the conclusion,
interpretation, implementation or cessation of the present contract will be
submitted to the mediator (name of the mediating person/body) ...b) the latter refers to an extra-contractual relationship
Every misunderstanding or dispute relative to the existence, fulfillment or
cessation of the extra-contractual obligation of commercial nature for at least one
of the parties, will be submitted to the mediator (name of the mediating
person/body) ...
The right question
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
70/78
Page
70
Which should be chosen out of the two ADR schemes?
or
How both types of ADR (by mediator and ombudsman) may beeffectively implemented to benefit both consumers and the institutions
providing financial services?
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
71/78
Page
71
Section VIII
Conclusions
Conclusions (1/3)ADR schemes
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
72/78
Page
72
ADR schemes
The need for ADR as an alternative to judicial settlement of consumer disputes
especially in the case of cross-border transactions
fact reflected by the development of various types of ADR bodies and procedures in the
EU Member States
Presently, the ADR schemes are in an early development stage in the EU ingeneral and in financial services in particular
Reasons:
ascending trend in the ADR field, consisting in an increasing numberof public andprivate schemes in the Member States
uneven development of ADR among Member States
lack of a standardized approach relative to the types of schemes and outcomes
relatively general EU regulations that established mostly the principles of ADR
Conclusions (2/3)Mediation in financial services
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
73/78
Page
73
Evolved as an ADR scheme several EU countries
Mediation schemes that are notified to the EC
exist in Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg and Portugal
Non-notified schemes
exist in France, Romania and Slovakia
Outcomes
schemes that are not focused on mediation but provide the outcome of a consensualmediated agreement, like in Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland and the UnitedKingdom
from a broad perspective, mediation and consensual agreement by mediation arepossible in ten Member States of the EU, in the field of financial services
compared to the broader concept of ADR (that incorporates more procedures thanmediation and that is in the early development stage in the EU), mediation in thefinancial service sector has reached only an emerging stage in the EU
Conclusions (3/3)Romania
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
74/78
Page
74
In Romania, mediation in financial services is just in a pre-emerging stage Reasons:
until 2009: absence of any ADR schemes specialized in financial services
since November 2009: there is only one mediation scheme dedicated to the financialservice sector
However, in the absence of mediation schemes, numerous complaints relative tofinancial services were submitted by consumers to the National Authority for ConsumerProtection (NACP)
No law especially dedicated to the mediation in the sector of financial service only a law that refers generally to the mediation of every type of dispute/conflict/litigation
the law comprises special provisions relative to mediation in civil, criminal and family law,but does not include a special section relative to mediation in commercial law.
Slight conflict between the two main initiators of mediation schemes UBMR & RBA
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
75/78
Page
75
Section IX
Recommendations
Recommendations (1/3)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
76/78
Page
76
Firstly, specialists and decision-makers must avoid placing limitationsin the path of the diversified development of ADR schemes in financialservices
The significant number of complaints on financial services received byNACP is a reason to promote various ADR schemes, among which rangemediation
The EU experience shows that in the early development stages, astandardized approach may hinder innovativeness and the ability toidentify solutions that are better suited to the customer needs for quick,effective, affordable and impartial settlement of disputes
In this stage, Romania should encourage the development ofdifferent ADRtechniques and bodies, in general and in financial services specifically.
Recommendations (2/3)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
77/78
Page
77
Secondly, the promoters of the various ADR schemes in financialservices should make a difference between ombudsman & mediator
should also acknowledge customers and mass media about the content ofthis difference
Thirdly, the experimentation of different ADR schemes may be
beneficial in orderto test and further improve them to better fulfill theirrole
the question is not which ADR scheme is the best, but how to developeach scheme in order to provide consumers with a reliable alternativedispute resolution
Recommendations (3/3)
8/6/2019 Presentation ADR
78/78
Page
78
Fourthly, another recommendation is to organize further in-depthresearch able to reveal the effectiveness of the various ADR schemesincluding mediation in the financial service sector
a perspective of both Romania and other EU Member States
potential research objectives:
effectiveness of mediation and other ADR schemes applied in thefinancial service sector in the EU Member States and in Romania
satisfaction of consumers relative to the outcomes of each scheme
duration and costs for consumers
outcomes and activities specific to each type of scheme
Top Related