Huella ambiental y huella de carbono: Herramientas …...Juan Antonio Polo Palomino. Socio en CO 2...

Juan Antonio Polo Palomino.Socio en CO2 Consulting

Co-chair PEF Pilot on Olive OilMadrid, 22 de noviembre de 2016

Huella ambiental y huella de

carbono: Herramientas para

comunicar la sostenibilidad de

un producto agroalimentario.

¿qué ha querido saber la sociedadsobre los alimentos que consume ?

2

80´s Seguridad90´s

Saludabilidad00´s

Funcionalidad

CO2 consulting. Todos los derechos reservados

Pero hoy…

• Medio ambiente 3er criterio de compra

• >75% dispuestos a pagar más por productos "eco-friendly” si estuvieran seguros

de que los productos son realmente respetuosos con el medio ambiente

Fuente: Flash Eurobarometer 367 - TNS Political & Social.

ATTITUDES OF EUROPEANS TOWARDS BUILDING THE SINGLE MARKET FOR GREEN PRODUCTS

3CO2 consulting. Todos los derechos reservados

Las expectativas del consumidor ante la información medioambiental

4

Fuente: Flash Eurobarometer 367 - TNS Political & Social. ATTITUDES OF EUROPEANS TOWARDS BUILDING THE SINGLE

MARKET FOR GREEN PRODUCTS

80% mercado

66%confían en etiquetado


El momento decisivo

CO2 consulting. Todos los derechos reservados 5


HUELLA DE CARBONO HUELLA AMBIENTAL DECLARACIÓN AMBIENTAL

• Enfoque a ciclo de vida (ISO 14044)

• Eco-etiquetas tipo 3 (ISO 14025)

• Utilizan reglas de categoría de producto (homogeneidad)

Vehículos de comunicaciónHerramientas de comunicación y eco-etiquetado


Cat

ego

ría

de

imp

acto

acid g SO2 eq

agot rec abio g Sb eq

ecotox fw g 1,4-DCB eq

ecotox h g 1,4-DCB eq

ecotox terr g 1,4-DCB eq

ecotox w g 1,4-DCB eq

eutrof g PO4 eq

GWP g CO2 eq

land use m2eq

odp g CFC-11

Oxfot g C2H4 eq

Pe

rfil

de

uso

de

re

curs

os

Recursos no renovables

Recursos energéticos no renovables MJ

Inputs no renovables Kg

Recursos renovables

Recursos energéticos renovables MJ

Inputs renovables Kg

Otros recursos

DECLARACIÓN AMBIENTAL

DE PRODUCTO(EPD)

HUELLA AMBIENTAL

HUELLA DE CARBONO

En términos conceptuales…

¿qué podemos ofrecer?


Fuente: Net storage CO2 in mediterranean olive and peah

orchards. C. Xylosannis, A. Sofo et al, 2005. Elaborado por CO2 consulting

dos iniciativas fundamentales que no debendejar de seguir


Product environmental footprints Pilots

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/index.htm


http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/index.htm

CO2 consulting S.L. All rights reserved.


Product environmental footprints Pilots

14producers fromItaly, Greece, Portugal andSpain

5industry

associations

5public

research bodies

1 localgovernment

1 third party body verifier

Co-chairing by:

Paricipantes en el Piloto sobre Aceite de Oliva


2cons

01/15

13

Calendario del proyecto

06/14 Kick-off 2nd wave

First screening studies completed 2nd wave

Start of 1st physical consultations 2nd wave

Start of virtual consultations 2nd wave

07/15 Start of 2nd physical consultations 2nd wave

Start of supporting studies 2nd wave

01/16 Start of virtual consultations 2nd wave

03/16 Start of the review of final PEFCR

06/16 Final PEFCRs

03/15

09/14

09/15

Kick-off PEF PILOT OLIVE OIL AND 1ST TRAINING

Kick-off PEF PILOT ON face to face meeting

Scope Document approved by SC

screening study

draft PEFPCR

Working on supporting studies

PEFCR and Secreening t approved by SC

12/16

Test communication

vehiclesverification

2nd draft pefcr Product environmental footprint category rule for olive oil


Third draft pefcr

La Regla de categoría de producto

14

Establecerá:

- Cómo se calcula la huella ambiental

de un aceite de oliva

- Propondrá herramientas sencillas y

datos por defecto

- Qué se comunica al mercado y,

- Cómo se comunica

La tasa de almacenamiento neto

de CO2 en suelo estará incluida,

como información adicional.



Guidance for climate change modelling v3.0

1

Guidance and requirements for climate change modelling in PEFCRs

Authors: An De Schryver (EC, DG ENV), Michele Galatola (EC, DG ENV), Erwin M. Schau

(EC, JRC), Lorenzo Benini (EC, JRC), Rana Pant (EC, JRC)

Version 3.0 – October 2016

The difference between v2.2 (February 2016) of this paper and v2.3 (October 2016) relates to the changed title

from 'biogenic carbon modelling' to 'climate change modelling', further clarifications on the choice of 300 years

time horizon, the definition of native forest, the elementary flows and characterisation factors to be used, and

how to model products derived from native forest. The final choice in modelling the sub-indicator 'biogenic' is

presented as the simplified approach.

Introduction The PEF guide (2013) provides rules for biogenic carbon modelling: "Credits associated with

temporary (carbon) storage or delayed emissions shall not be considered in the calculation of

the default EF impact categories. However, these may be included as additional

environmental information (p32). Moreover, the application of PAS 2050:2011 (BSI 2011,

p38) and supplemented by the PAS2050-1 (BSI 2012, p39), is recommended for modeling

emissions from land use change".

This paper gives additional guidance and requirements for biogenic carbon modelling when

developing a PEFCR. The following items will be addressed: (i) the introduction of three

climate change sub-indicators, (ii) the reporting of the sub-indicators and (iii) guidance for

modelling each sub-indicator.

The guidelines provided in this issue paper represent a simplified approach to be applied in

the final draft PEFCR to be submitted on 21 December 2016, and will be integrated in the

remodelling exercise of the representative product(s). In case the default requirements

included in this paper are not followed, the reasoning shall be clearly explained and justified

in the final PEFCR. Other assessments, such as carbon tracking or credits from biogenic

carbon storage, can be included in the PEFCR as 'additional environmental information'.

Climate change impact category The impact category 'climate change' covers three sub-indicators:

1) Climate change – fossil

2) Climate change – biogenic

3) Climate change – land use and land transformation

Guidance for climate change modelling v3.0

4

Sub-indicator 3: Climate change – land use and land transformation

This indicator accounts for carbon uptakes and emissions (CO2, CO and CH4) originating

from carbon stock changes caused by land use change and soil carbon uptake

(accumulation) and emissions through land management (land use). This indicator

includes deforestation, road construction or other soil activities. For native forests, all related

CO2 emissions are included and modelled under this indicator (e.g., connected soil emissions,

products derived from native forest7 and residues), while their CO2 uptake is excluded. For

non-native forests, all related emissions are included and modelled under sub-indicator 2.

Modelling requirements

The flows falling under this definition shall be modelled consistently with the most updated

ILCD list of elementary flows and using the flow names ending with '(land use change)'.

Biogenic carbon uptakes and emissions have to be inventoried separately for each elementary

flow.

All carbon emissions and removals arising from land use change shall be modelled following

the modelling guidelines of PAS 2050:2011 (BSI 2011) and the supplementary document

PAS2050-1:2012 (BSI 2012) for horticultural products8. Intermediate products (cradle to

gate) derived from native forest shall always report as meta-data (i) their carbon content and

(ii) that corresponding carbon emissions shall be modelled with '(land use change)' elementary

flows.

Soil carbon uptake (accumulation) via improved land management9 shall be excluded from

the footprint results, while soil carbon emissions shall be included (e.g., from rice fields). Soil

carbon emissions derived from residues, except for native forest residues, shall be modelled

under sub-indicator 2 (e.g., the application of non-native forest residues or straw on soil).

Whenever legislation has different modelling requirements for the sector this shall be taken

into account and reported separately as additional information. For example the EU

greenhouse gas accounting directive from 2013 (Decision 529/2013/EU) which indicate

carbon stock accounting.

Characterisation factors of methane, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide

Within the current PEF/OEF impact assessment method the global warming potentials of the

Third assessment report of IPCC (2007) are applied. The GWPs shall be updated using the

Fifth assessment report of IPCC (2013), including climate-change carbon feedbacks for both

CO2 and non-CO2 substances (following the UNEP/SETAC recommendations of the Pellston

Workshop, January 2016). The values with feedbacks are applied to ensure consistency, as

feedbacks are already included for CO2. The GWPs of well-mixed GHGs can be found in

chapter 8 of the Scientific basis report, Tables 8.7 and 8.SM.16. The GWPs for near term

GHGs are not recommended for use due to their complexity and high uncertainty. Near term

7 Following the instantaneous oxidation approach in IPCC 2013 (Chapter 2). 8 In the next version of the guidance document these guidelines will be copied and included for transparency reasons. 9Such as tilling techniques and other management actions taken in relation to agricultural land.

La visión del Consejo Oleícola Internacional

16

¿qué papel le corresponde al

Consejo Oleícola?

¿cómo convertir este panorama en una

oportunidad estratégica para el

aceite de oliva?


17

En marzo de 2012, crea un grupo de trabajo de expertos

La visión del Consejo OleícolaInternacional

o The inclusion of environmental information in consumer information

policies represents a great challenge due to the important economic

and legal consequences it may have

o The IOC should develop a consumer information strategy in parallel with

the development of the tools for the calculation of environmental

impacts


App de balance de carbono en olivar

Acceso Carbon balance Resultados obtenidos


Concluyendo


① El ecoetiquetado en productos de alimentación es un factor de diferenciación

positiva exitoso y reconocido por el mercado

② Existen suficientes herramientas normalizadas que se ajustan a la

estrategia y a los recursos de cualquier operador del sector.

③ El valor medioambiental del ecosistemas como el olivar como fijador y

sumidero de CO2 ya puede comunicarse adicionalmente, según los estándares

internacionales, aunque el reto es lograr imponer el concepto de balance de

CO2 neto positivo y comunicarlo al consumidor. Y en ello estamos.

④ España debe liderar el mensaje de que a través de prácticas agronómicas

adecuadas, la agricultura puede formar parte de la solución ante el

cambio climático, ¡cambiemos el discurso! La gente del campo lo

agradecerá…

21

Juan Antonio Polo [email protected]

www.co2co.es


¡cambiemos el discurso! La gente

del campo lo agradecerá…

mailto:[email protected]

Huella ambiental y huella de carbono: Herramientas …...Juan Antonio Polo Palomino. Socio en CO 2...

Documents

Transcript of Huella ambiental y huella de carbono: Herramientas …...Juan Antonio Polo Palomino. Socio en CO 2...