Gisela 12
-
Upload
luis-andres-aguilera-cuevas -
Category
Documents
-
view
37 -
download
0
Transcript of Gisela 12
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 1/20
Gisela 12®
Nuevo portainjerto de Cerezos:
precoz y productivo
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 2/20
En USA han evaluado un nuevo portainjerto de la serie Gissen, denominadoGisela 12, este ha presentado ventajas interesantes en precocidad, vigor y
especialmente un mejor calibre de la fruta.
El vigor de G.12 depende de la variedad que se combina, se ha visto enOregón que combinado con Bing su vigor es intermedio entre G.5 y G.6.
Pero al usarse G.12 con Regina, presenta vigor un 10% superior a G.6 y es
preferido por los productores ya que es mas fácil manejar el vigor y calibrede la fruta.Ambos, G.6 y G.12 son muy productivos y precoces en entrar enproducción.
G.12 se adapta muy bien a diferentes tipos de suelos y aparentemente seadapta bien a suelos húmedos al igual que G.6.
Los árboles en G.12 presentan ramas abiertas y con buenos ángulos.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 3/20
Terence Robinson de la Universidad de Cornell en NY, ha evaluado por 8años el portainjerto Gisela 12 con las variedades Lapins y Regina,
comparando su efecto sobre:
• Sobrevivencia de los árboles
• Tamaño de árbol• Calibre de la fruta• Productividad
• Eficiencia productiva• Rentabilidad
Todos estos factores se comparan con los portainjertos Gisela 5, 6 y Mazzarddespués de 8 años de información acumulada.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 4/20
Tree Survival
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lapins Regina
8 Y r . T r e e S u r v i v a l ( % )
Gi.5
Gi.6
Gi.12
Mazzard
No hay gran diferencia entre la sobrevivencia de los 3 Giselas y todos
son mejores que Mazzard. Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 5/20
Tree Size
50
100
150
200
250
Lapins Regina
T r u n k C r o s s - s e c t i o n a l a r e a ( c m
2 ) Gi.5
Gi.6Gi.12
Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 6/20
Effect of Tree density on Tree Size
50
100
150
200
250
300
500 600 700 800 900 1000
Tree Density/ha
T r u n k C r o s s - s e c t i o
n a l A r e a ( c m
2
)
Gi.5
Gi.6Gi.12
Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 7/20
Production
8 Year-old Trial
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Lapins Regina
8 Y r . C u m u l a
t i v e Y i e l d ( t / h a
)Gi.5
Gi.6Gi.12
Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 8/20
Fruit Size
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lapins Regina
A v e r a g
e F r u i t S i z e ( g )
Gi.5
Gi.6
Gi.12Mazzard
El calibre de la fruta es un factor que diferencia a Gisela 12, consistentementedurante 8 años este portainjerto da mas calibre que Gisela 5, 6 y Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 9/20
Effect of Tree density on Fruit Size
7
8
9
10
11
12
500 600 700 800 900 1000
Tree Density/ha
A v e r a g e F r u i t S i z e ( g )
Gi.5
Gi.6
Gi.12
Mazzard
Gisela 12 es el portainjerto que presenta mayor calibre de fruta, inclusocuando se aumenta la densidad de plantación.
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 10/20
Yield Efficiency
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Lapins Regina 8 Y r . C u m u l a t i v e Y i e l d E f f i c i e n c y ( k g / c m
2 T C A )
Gi.5
Gi.6Gi.12
Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 11/20
Increasing Tree Density Improves Cumulative YieldDramatically
8 Year-old Trial, 40-90 kg/additional tree
y = 0.083x - 22
y = 0.063x - 11
y = 0.091x - 28
y = 0.040x - 17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
500 600 700 800 900 1000
Tree Density/ha
8 Y r . C u m u l a t i v e Y
i e l d ( t o n s / h a )
Gi.5
Gi.6
Gi.12
Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 12/20
Crop Value
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Lapins Regina
8 Y r . C u m . C r o p V a l u e ( $ / h a
)Gi.5Gi.6G.12Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 13/20
Increasing Tree Density Improves Gross Returns
8 Year-old Trial
$52-74/additional tree
y = 72.6x - 4159
y = 70.0x - 7661
y = 73.9x - 170
y = 51.6x - 20938
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
500 600 700 800 900 1000Tree Density/ha
8 Y r . C u m
. C r o p V a l u e ( $ / h a )
Gi.5
Gi.6
Gi.12
Mazzard
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 14/20
Orchard System Yield Performance
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Year
Y i e l
d ( t / h a )
Vertical AxisCentral Leader
Spanish Bush
Quad Axis
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 15/20
Conclusions on Dwarfing Rootstocks
• Gisela 5• Trees on Gi.5 are about 60-65% the size of trees onseedling rootstocks.
• Trees on Gisela 5 are 2.5 times as productive as treeson seedling stocks.
• Trees on Gisela 5 should be planted at densities from
400-800 trees/acre.• Irrigation is essential.• Aggressive crop load management is required.
• Gisela 6• Trees on Gi.6 are about 70-80% the size of trees on
seedling rootstocks
• Trees on Gisela 6 are 2-2.5 times as productive as treeson seedling stocks
• Trees on Gisela 6 should be planted at densities from300-500 trees/acre.
• Gisela 12• Trees on Gi.12 are about 80-90% the size of trees on
seedling rootstocks• Trees on Gisela 12 are 2.5 times as productive as trees
on seedling stocks• Trees on Gisela 12 should be planted at densities from
300-500 trees/acre.• Productive with good fruit size
Source: Terence Robinson, Cornell University, NY.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 16/20
Source: Lynn Long, Oregon State University
GoodLowGoodNoNo100Mazzard
GoodNoGoodNoYes90-100Maxma 14
GoodNoGood-FairNoSlightly90Mahaleb
GoodModerateLimited dataNoYes65-70Krymsk 6
GoodModerateLimited dataNoYes80-90Krymsk 5
GoodNoGoodNoYes75-95Gisela 12
FairNoGood0-1 dayYes85-90Gisela 6
Fair-
GoodNoGood2-4 daysYes50-60Gisela 5
GoodNoGoodNoNo100Colt
AnchorageRoot
SuckersCompatability
Advance
bloom/harvestPrecociousPercentTree Size
Rootstock characteristics
En Oregon State University, Lynn Long ha evaluado Gisela 12 con resultados
muy interesantes, los cuales se presentan a continuación:
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 17/20
Gisela 12 (P. cerasus x P. canescens)
Tree vigor and size on Gisela 12 is variable dependingupon cultivar combination. Several years of testing inThe Dalles, Oregon, and Prosser, Washington,
indicated that when combined with Bing, Gisela 12produced a tree intermediate in size to Gisela 5 and 6.However, grower experience with Regina indicates that
Gisela 12 produces a tree approximately 10 percentlarger than Gisela 6. Some growers prefer the
Regina/Gisela 12 combination, as they find it easier tomaintain shoot growth and, ultimately, fruit size. It isboth precocious and productive, producing early heavycrops, with full production possible by the fifth leaf.Good fruit size and quality is possible with proper
pruning. Gisela 12 is adapted to a wide range of soils,and tree structure is open and spreading and newbranches form readily.
Source: Lynn Long, Oregon State University
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 18/20
Lapins en Gisela 12:• Presenta vigor similar a Gisela 6o un 10% superior.
• Buen ángulo y buen calibre
• Puede ser auto soportante, nopresenta diferencia de diámetroentre el tronco y la variedad.
7/15/2019 Gisela 12
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gisela-12 19/20
Source: Lynn Long, Oregon State University