Focus for profit

270
1

Transcript of Focus for profit

Page 1: Focus for profit

1

Page 2: Focus for profit

2

BIENVENIDA

III Seminario Anual "FOCUS FOR PROFIT: La importancia del enfoque en el nuevo panorama de Medios.

El primer año hablamos Del poder de TV Paga.

El año pasado hablamos de engagement: Impacto efectivo de la publicidad.

Hoy hablaremos de la importancia del ENFOQUE en el nuevo panorama de Medios, tema para el cual hemos invitado a la reconocida y experimentada Laura Ries.

Page 3: Focus for profit

3

LAMAC

Gary McBride Presidente LAMAC.

Daniela Martinez Directora Andina LAMAC.

Harol Rey Gerente de Investigaciones LAMAC Colombia.

Margarita Giraldo Gerente LAMAC Colombia.

Page 4: Focus for profit

4

Actividades

•Guía TV Paga

•Newsletter

•Capacitación Herramienta de Optimización

•Proyectos especiales con grandes anunciantes

Page 5: Focus for profit

5

CARLOS DELGADO

PRESIDENTE ANDA

Page 6: Focus for profit

6

Page 7: Focus for profit

7

Bienvenidos al III Seminario Anual de Televisión Paga

Page 8: Focus for profit

8

Objetivo

Compartir cifras actualizadas de televisión Paga

Discutir nuevos conceptos de mercadeo

Page 9: Focus for profit

9

El medio tradicional

ERA

la fuente primaria de información y entretenimiento

Page 10: Focus for profit

10

Los consumidores tienen muchas alternativas

Page 11: Focus for profit

11

Los consumidores son más cínicos

Page 12: Focus for profit

12

6 clicks, 2 segundos de distancia…

Page 13: Focus for profit

13

Los consumidores

son más inteligentes

Page 14: Focus for profit

14

Ahora es muy complicado lograr diferenciación

Page 15: Focus for profit

15

Hoy todos los productos se pueden duplicar

Page 16: Focus for profit

16

No hay diferencia en distribución productos

No hay diferencia en los precios

Page 17: Focus for profit

17

¿Cómo se logra la diferenciación?

Page 18: Focus for profit

18

Con el mensaje publicitario y los medios

Page 19: Focus for profit

19

Pero los medios han recibido menos

importancia como herramienta para la diferenciación de las

marcas

Page 20: Focus for profit

20

Históricamente … “¡Necesito alcance!” “¡Necesito estar en

Caracol y RCN porque mi competidor está ahí!”

“¡quiero unos bajos CPM!”

Page 21: Focus for profit

21

¿Por qué insistimos en regresar a los hábitos y costumbres de

siempre?

Page 22: Focus for profit

22

Los medios masivos están perdiendo relevancia

Los medios selectivos la están ganando

Page 23: Focus for profit

23

2004 2007

Incremento

La penetración de TV Paga muestra una tendencia en

crecimiento

58%

Fuente: IBOPE TGI Latina, Base Colombia

74,6%

29%29%29%29%

Page 24: Focus for profit

24

El share de TV Abierta ha ido bajando

El share de TV abierta ha bajado de 83% a

73% Target Total Personas

82.8%

79.4%

76.1%

70%

75%

80%

85%

Ma

r-04

Ma

y-04

Jul-0

4

Sep

-04

No

v-04

Ene

-05

Ma

r-05

Ma

y-05

Jul-0

5

Sep

-05

No

v-05

Ene

-06

Ma

r-06

Ma

y-06

Jul-0

6

Sep

-06

No

v-06

Ene

-07

Ma

r-07

Ma

y-07

73.3%

Fuente: IBOPE Colombia, Telereport, share mensual Marzo 2004 -junio 2007, total día, lunes a domingo, target total personas. Penetración IBOPE

Page 25: Focus for profit

25

El share de TV Paga, esta aumentando

Target Total Personas

16.2%

19.7%

22.3%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Ma

r-04

Ma

y-04

Jul-0

4

Sep

-04

Nov-

04

Ene-0

5

Ma

r-05

Ma

y-05

Jul-0

5

Sep

-05

Nov-

05

Ene-0

6

Ma

r-06

Ma

y-06

Jul-0

6

Sep

-06

Nov-

06

Ene-0

7

Ma

r-07

Ma

y-07

Share

Fuente: IBOPE Colombia, Telereport, share mensual Marzo 2004 -junio 2007, total día, lunes a domingo, target total personas. Penetración IBOPE

24.3%

Page 26: Focus for profit

26

TV Paga es efectiva y eficiente…

48%36%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

49%37%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

22%24%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

75%37%P 4- 11

Ahorros enpresupuesto

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

48%36%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

49%37%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

22%24%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

75%37%P 4- 11

Ahorros enpresupuesto

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

48%36%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

49%37%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

22%24%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

75%37%P 4- 11

Ahorros enpresupuesto

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

48%36%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

49%37%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

22%24%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

75%37%P 4- 11

Ahorros enpresupuesto

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

8%49%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

7%45%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

3%27%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

23%60%P 4- 11 Med- Alt

% de Alcance Adicional

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

8%49%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

7%45%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

3%27%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

23%60%P 4- 11 Med- Alt

% de Alcance Adicional

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

8%49%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

7%45%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

3%27%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

23%60%P 4- 11 Med- Alt

% de Alcance Adicional

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

8%49%P 12- 17 Med- Alt

7%45%Hombres 18+ Med- Alt

3%27%Mujeres 18+ Med- Alt

23%60%P 4- 11 Med- Alt

% de Alcance Adicional

%Inv en TV PagaTarget

Fuente: IBOPE Colombia: Planview, todos los planes se hicieron con cuatro semanas y seleccionando soportes con un minimos de afinidad de 120

Page 27: Focus for profit

27

Penetración de IBOPE del 50%

No se ha actualizado desde el año 2004

Page 28: Focus for profit

28

En Colombia los cambios de penetración son drásticos

Page 29: Focus for profit

29

Cambios esperados en la penetración de TV Paga

Penetración Actual

TV Paga50.0%

Estimado Penetración TV Paga en IBOPE 2008

TV Paga65.0%

Fuente: IBOPE Colombia y estimado de penetración a partir de enero 2008

Page 30: Focus for profit

30

TV abierta pierde un 45% de su audiencia en hogares con TV

Paga

10.9%

6.1%

5.5%

Personas sin TV Paga Personas con TV Paga

Ven TV Abierta Ven TV Paga

-45%

Fuente: IBOPE Media, Telereport, rating promedio enero-junio 2007, lunes a domingo, 06:00-30:00,

Page 31: Focus for profit

31

Cambios esperados en el SHARE de TV Paga

Share Actual

TV Paga24%

Share Estimado TV Paga en IBOPE 2008

TV Paga32%

Fuente: IBOPE Colombia y estimado de share a partir de enero 2008

Page 32: Focus for profit

32

El aumento en el share de TV Paga implica una reducción de la audiencia en TV

abierta

33%

-11%-20%

0%

20%

40%

TV Abierta TV Paga

Fuente: IBOPE Colombia y estimado de share a partir de enero 2008

Page 33: Focus for profit

33

Los planes de Medios para 2008 tienen que considerar

esta cifra

Page 34: Focus for profit

34

Lo importante es hacer algo al respecto

Page 35: Focus for profit

35

La inversión mínima en el 2008 en TV Paga debe

ser 32%

Page 36: Focus for profit

36

¡No hacerlo es obviar el ritmo del mercado!

Page 37: Focus for profit

37

Sabemos que si están respondiendo

La inversión publicitaria en el medio crece a un ritmo superior del 50%

Pero todavía la inversión no corresponde a la importancia del medio

Page 38: Focus for profit

38

TV Paga tiene solamente el 3% de inversión total

televisiva

Page 39: Focus for profit

39

Enviar un mensaje a todo el mundo ya no resulta

eficaz

Cada vez es más importante alcanzar al

target enfocado

Page 40: Focus for profit

40

Hay que utilizar medios que segmenten

Que permitan generar un vínculo emocional con las

marcas

Page 41: Focus for profit

41

Frans Kok, Market Response

Page 42: Focus for profit

42

Ratings≠

Efectividad

Efectividad=

Apreciación

Page 43: Focus for profit

43

Pam Batalis: “Engagement y su efecto en ROI”

Page 44: Focus for profit

44

Engagement

Efectividad

ROI

Page 45: Focus for profit

45

Laura Ries: Focus for ProfitPresidente de Ries & Ries•Fundadora de la firma de mercadeo estratégico Ries & Ries.

•Graduada con honores de la Universidad de Northwestern en Evanston, Illinois.

•Coautora de varios libros como “Las 22 leyes inmutables de la marca”, y “El origen de las marcas”.

Page 46: Focus for profit

46

LAMAC

Page 47: Focus for profit

47

Page 48: Focus for profit

48

Traditional media approach.

Reach:Reach everybody in the target market.

& Frequency:As often as you can afford.

Page 49: Focus for profit

49

In other words.

Page 50: Focus for profit

50

Start with a big bang.

Page 51: Focus for profit

51

Hopefully, sales take off, too.

Time

Sa

les It never happens.

Page 52: Focus for profit

52

Most successful new product.

Page 53: Focus for profit

53

Sales of Apple iPods.

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

2001 2002 2003 3004 2005 2006

In millions.

Page 54: Focus for profit

54

“Reach everybody” is obsolete.

Years ago, there was less advertising and fewer competitors. It was a timeyou could afford to reach everybody.

Today, you need to rethink yourreach everybody strategy.

Today, you need to reach somebody.Somebody that counts.

Page 55: Focus for profit

55

“Reach somebody” is hot.

Today, you need to reach somebody.It is not about reaching everybody.

It is about reaching the somebody that counts.

Page 56: Focus for profit

56

It’s like lighting a fire.

Page 57: Focus for profit

57

You light the easiest twig first.

Page 58: Focus for profit

58

Eventually all the logs burn.

Page 59: Focus for profit

59

Look at Internet brands.

Back in the days of the Dot.com Bubblehundreds of brands were launched

with massive, reach everybody advertising campaigns.

Page 60: Focus for profit

60

All were spectacular failures.

Back in the days of the Dot.com Bubblehundreds of brands were launched

with massive, reach everybody advertising campaigns.

Page 61: Focus for profit

61

A typical Internet launch.

Pets.com

Page 62: Focus for profit

62

$60 million on advertising.

Page 63: Focus for profit

63

$22 million in sales.

Page 64: Focus for profit

64

The patient died.

Page 65: Focus for profit

65

Another Internet disaster.

Webvan.com

Page 66: Focus for profit

66

Launched with a massive ...

... reach everybody campaign.

Page 67: Focus for profit

67

Two years later, they folded.

Webvan loss:$830 million.

Page 68: Focus for profit

68

Another Internet brand.

FreshDirect.com

Page 69: Focus for profit

69

The same strategy as Webvan.

Page 70: Focus for profit

70

Webvan versus Fresh Direct.

Webvan launched a national brand with operations in many cities.

Fresh Direct concentrated on one market (New York City.)

Page 71: Focus for profit

71

Broadcast vs. cable TV.

Webvan used massive advertising, including broadcast TV.

Fresh Direct used selective media,including cable TV.

Page 72: Focus for profit

72

$200 million and profitable.

Page 73: Focus for profit

73

The only Internet successes.

Only those brands that started small,with small advertising budgets, andthen gradually built a customer base

through word-of-mouth.

Page 74: Focus for profit

74

Successful Internet brands.

Amazon.

eBay.

Yahoo!

Google.

Page 75: Focus for profit

75

There’s another reason.

Most people don’t make their branding decisions from exposure to advertising.

Page 76: Focus for profit

76

The most powerful medium?

Television?

Radio?

Magazines?

Newspapers?

Outdoor?

Page 77: Focus for profit

77

None of these.

Television.

Radio.

Magazines.

Newspapers.

Outdoor.

Page 78: Focus for profit

78

The most powerful medium.

Word of mouth.

Page 79: Focus for profit

79

Motivated by an advertisement.

Motivatedby an ad

Page 80: Focus for profit

80

Nine by word of mouth.

Motivatedby an ad

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

• Word of mouth

Page 81: Focus for profit

81

Reach the one that counts.

Motivatedby an ad

Page 82: Focus for profit

82

To put an idea into a prospect’s mind takes time.

The law of patience.

Page 83: Focus for profit

83

Do brands take off like rockets?

Page 84: Focus for profit

84

Or like an airplane?

Page 85: Focus for profit

85

Big bang or slow take-off?

Rocket ship

Airplane

Page 86: Focus for profit

86

XM Satellite Radio.

2001 advertising budget . . . $100 million

2002 advertising budget . . . $58 million

Page 87: Focus for profit

87

After $158 million dollars.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

4 2002 2 3 4 2003 2 3 4 2004 2 3 4 2005 2 3 4 2006

Mill

ion

s o

f s

ub

sc

rib

ers

400,000 subscribers

Page 88: Focus for profit

88

Now over 6 million subscribers.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

4 2002 2 3 4 2003 2 3 4 2004 2 3 4 2005 2 3 4 2006

Mill

ion

s o

f s

ub

sc

rib

ers

Page 89: Focus for profit

89

Now over 6 million subscribers.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

4 2002 2 3 4 2003 2 3 4 2004 2 3 4 2005 2 3 4 2006

The tipping point

Mill

ion

s o

f s

ub

sc

rib

ers

Page 90: Focus for profit

90

Annual sales of a new drink.

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 '01 '03 '05

Sales in millions.

Nine years to reach$100 million in sales.

Page 91: Focus for profit

91

The brand is Red Bull.

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 '01 '03 '05

Sales in millions.

Page 92: Focus for profit

92

$3.4 billion in annual sales.

Page 93: Focus for profit

93

18 years to reach $100 million.

Page 94: Focus for profit

94

Fractional jet ownership.

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

86 88 90 92 94 96 98 '00 '02 '04

Tipping point

Cresting point

Page 95: Focus for profit

95

Annual sales of a new chain.

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 '01 '03 '05

In millions.

Page 96: Focus for profit

96

The chain is Starbucks.

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 '01 '03 '05

In millions.

Page 97: Focus for profit

97

U.S. cellphone subscribers.

0

40

80

120

160

200

85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 '01 '03 '05

In millions.

Page 98: Focus for profit

98

The rise of Volkswagen.

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968

Page 99: Focus for profit

99

Annual sales of a new airline.

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

'71 '74 '77 '80 '83 '86 '89 '92 '95 '98 '01 '04

Revenues in millions.

10 years to reach $100 million

Page 100: Focus for profit

100

The airline is Southwest.

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

'71 '74 '77 '80 '83 '86 '89 '92 '95 '98 '01 '04

Revenues in millions.

Page 101: Focus for profit

101

Ryanair passengers.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 '01 '03 '05

In millions.

Page 102: Focus for profit

102

Annual sales of software brand.

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

'75 '78 '81 '84 '87 '90 '93 '96 '99 '02 '05

Revenues in millions.

10 years to reach$100 million

Page 103: Focus for profit

103

The brand is Microsoft.

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

'75 '78 '81 '84 '87 '90 '93 '96 '99 '02 '05

Revenues in millions.

Page 104: Focus for profit

104

Annual sales of a retail brand.

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

$350,000

'62 '66 '70 '74 '78 '82 '86 '90 '94 '98 '02 '06

b

Sales in millions.

14 years to reach$100 million

Page 105: Focus for profit

105

The brand is Wal-Mart.

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

$350,000

'62 '66 '70 '74 '78 '82 '86 '90 '94 '98 '02 '06

b

Sales in millions.

Page 106: Focus for profit

106

A mythical sales curve.

Time

Sa

les

Page 107: Focus for profit

107

A normal sales curve.

Time

Sa

les

Page 108: Focus for profit

108

What advertising works best?

?

Page 109: Focus for profit

109

What advertising works best?

Advertisingthat drives

word of mouth.

Page 110: Focus for profit

110

Make sure your ads contain words that consumers can use to pass along your message.

The law of verbalization.

Page 111: Focus for profit

111

Chevrolet.

“An American revolution.”

Page 112: Focus for profit

112

Infiniti.

“Renegade, fearless, bold . . .

Page 113: Focus for profit

113

Coca-Cola advertising.

Polar bears drink Coke?

Page 114: Focus for profit

114

BMW.

“The ultimate driving machine.”

Page 115: Focus for profit

115

BMW.

It must be fun to drive.

Page 116: Focus for profit

116

Barilla.

Italy’s #1 pasta.

Page 117: Focus for profit

117

The lonely Maytag repairman.

The dependable brand.

Page 118: Focus for profit

118

McDonald’s.

“You deserve a break today.

Page 119: Focus for profit

119

When you lose focusyour strategies change from reaching somebody to reaching everybody.

The law of focus.

Page 120: Focus for profit

120

What happened to Dell?

Page 121: Focus for profit

121

Dell was totally focused.

• One product, the personal computer.

• One market, the business market.

• One distribution channel,direct by phone.

• Dell Computer had best stock market performance in the decade of the 1990s.

Page 122: Focus for profit

122

Today, Dell is in trouble.

Business Week, September 4, 2006.

Page 123: Focus for profit

123

Computer market shares.

Hewlett-Packard . . . 19 percent.

Dell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 percent.

Lenovo . . . . . . . . . . . 7 percent.

Acer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 percent.

Toshiba . . . . . . . . . . . 4 percent.

First quarter, 2007.

Page 124: Focus for profit

124

Dell is no longer focused.

•One product: The PC.

•One market: Business.

•One channel: Direct.

Page 125: Focus for profit

125

Dell is no longer focused.

•Many products.

•One market: Business.

•One channel: Direct.

Page 126: Focus for profit

126

Dell is no longer focused.

•Many products.

•Business and consumer.

•One channel: Direct.

Page 127: Focus for profit

127

Dell is no longer focused.

•Many products.

•Business and consumer.

•Direct and retail.

Page 128: Focus for profit

128

Consumers are only 15 percent.

Business

Consumer

Page 129: Focus for profit

129

14 flavors of Coca-Cola.

Page 130: Focus for profit

130

Two flavors: 87 percent.

Page 131: Focus for profit

131

Four flavors: 96 percent.

Page 132: Focus for profit

132

Six different shaving gels.

Page 133: Focus for profit

133

Five flavors of Tabasco sauce?

Page 134: Focus for profit

134

Eight flavors of vodka?

Page 135: Focus for profit

135

Wal-Mart’s fashion moves.

• Hired a top executive from Target.

• Opened an office in Manhattan’sFashion District.

• Presented a fashion show in New York.

• Ran an 8-page advertisement in Vogue.

Page 136: Focus for profit

136

“Upgrade style falls flat.”

The Wall Street Journal, October 17, 2006.

Page 137: Focus for profit

137

“Wal-Mart’s midlife crisis.”

Business Week, April 30, 2007.

Page 138: Focus for profit

138

When you expand a brand,you weaken the brand.

The law of expansion.

Page 139: Focus for profit

139

Largest U.S. advertised brand.

$7.1 billionon advertising.

Last 10 years

Page 140: Focus for profit

140

Would you believe?

Chevrolet.

Page 141: Focus for profit

141

What’s a Chevrolet?

Page 142: Focus for profit

142

What’s a Chevrolet?

A large, small, cheap, expensive car or truck.

Page 143: Focus for profit

143

A burned-out brand.

Page 144: Focus for profit

144

All GM brands are in trouble.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, January 27, 2006.

Page 145: Focus for profit

145

What’s a Volkswagen?

Page 146: Focus for profit

146

A small, ugly, reliable car.

Page 147: Focus for profit

147

Think big.

Page 148: Focus for profit

148

Think fast.

Page 149: Focus for profit

149

Think smart.

Page 150: Focus for profit

150

Think ahead.

Page 151: Focus for profit

151

Or don’t think at all.

Page 152: Focus for profit

152

Volkswagen’s downhill drive.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2003

Percentage of U.S.import market

Page 153: Focus for profit

153

Volkswagen’s downhill drive.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2003

Percentage of U.S.import market

Notice the blip.

Page 154: Focus for profit

154

Volkswagen 2.0

Page 155: Focus for profit

155

Now that’s a Volkswagen!

Page 156: Focus for profit

156

What’s a Mercedes?

Prestige.

Page 157: Focus for profit

157

Mercedes went downmarket.

Business Week, August 26, 1996.

Page 158: Focus for profit

158

Cheap Mercedes sports car.

$40,000

Page 159: Focus for profit

159

The off-the-road Mercedes.

$35,000

Page 160: Focus for profit

160

The Mercedes minivan.

$27,000

Page 161: Focus for profit

161

The Mercedes minitruck.

$25,000

Page 162: Focus for profit

162

The mini Mercedes.

$17,000

Page 163: Focus for profit

163

Failed the moose test.

Scandinavia.

Page 164: Focus for profit

164

Mercedes Smartcar.

$9,000

Page 165: Focus for profit

165

Mercedes mountain bike.

$1,900

Page 166: Focus for profit

166

Baby Benz.

$89.50

Page 167: Focus for profit

167

Question:

What happens when you introduce cheap versions

of expensive products?

Page 168: Focus for profit

168

You have a perception problem.

Can’t be any good.

Page 169: Focus for profit

169

“Mercedes hits a pothole.”

Fortune, October 27, 2003.

Page 170: Focus for profit

170

“An engineering icon slips.”

The Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2002.

Page 171: Focus for profit

171

“Mercedes’ head-on collision.”

Business Week, July 21, 2003

Page 172: Focus for profit

172

What’s a Saturn?

Page 173: Focus for profit

173

Saturn of the Hamptons.

The average Saturn dealer.

Page 174: Focus for profit

174

The only brand with one model.

Page 175: Focus for profit

175

Vehicles sold per dealer, 1994.

Saturn . . . . . . . 960

Toyota . . . . . . . . 841

Ford . . . . . . . . . . 746

Honda . . . . . . . . 677

Nissan . . . . . . . . 661

Chevrolet . . . . . 553

Page 176: Focus for profit

176

Saturn went upmarket.

Page 177: Focus for profit

177

Double sales?

Automotive News, April 5, 1999.

Page 178: Focus for profit

178

Vehicles sold per dealer, 2006.

Toyota . . 1,821 Mercedes . 731Lexus . . . 1,479 Infiniti . . . . 675Honda . . . 1,286 Ford . . . . . 645Nissan . . . 839 Hyundai . . 628BMW . . . . . 811 Chevrolet . 586Acura . . . . . 757 Saturn . . . 520

Page 179: Focus for profit

179

Young and single: Saturn.

Page 180: Focus for profit

180

Young and single: Saturn.

Page 181: Focus for profit

181

Promoted with a raise: BMW.

Page 182: Focus for profit

182

Promoted with a raise: BMW.

Page 183: Focus for profit

183

Married with kids: Volvo.

Page 184: Focus for profit

184

Married with kids: Volvo.

Page 185: Focus for profit

185

Divorced: Ferrari.

Page 186: Focus for profit

186

Divorced: Ferrari.

Page 187: Focus for profit

187

The ladder of life.

Rolex

Seiko

Swatch

Page 188: Focus for profit

188

A brand becomes strongerwhen you narrow its focus.

The law of contraction.

Page 189: Focus for profit

189

Every town had a coffee shop.

Page 190: Focus for profit

190

What did Howard Schultz do?

Page 191: Focus for profit

191

Coffee shop just sells coffee.

Page 192: Focus for profit

192

Howard is worth millions.

Page 193: Focus for profit

193

Willie is broke.

Page 194: Focus for profit

194

Every town had a delicatessen.

Page 195: Focus for profit

195

What did Fred DeLuca do?

Page 196: Focus for profit

196

The submarine sandwich.

Page 197: Focus for profit

197

Subway.A submarine name.

Page 198: Focus for profit

198

Fast-food chains. 1. McDonald’s . . . . . . . . . . $25.6 billion

2. Burger King . . . . . . . . . . $8.0 billion

3. Wendy’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7.8 billion

4. Subway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7.2 billion

5. Taco Bell . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.2 billion

6. Pizza Hut . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5.3 billion

7. Kentucky Fried Chicken $5.2 billion

8. Starbucks . . . . . . . . . . . . $4.9 billion2005 U.S. sales.

Page 199: Focus for profit

199

Fred DeLuca’s salary.

1990 . . . . . . . . . . . $27 million

1991 . . . . . . . . . . . $32 million

1992 . . . . . . . . . . . $42 million

1993 . . . . . . . . . . . $54 million

1994 . . . . . . . . . . . $60 million

Page 200: Focus for profit

200

The power of a focus.

Page 201: Focus for profit

201

Billions of kilowatts.

Page 202: Focus for profit

202

You can sit safely in the sun.

Page 203: Focus for profit

203

A few kilowatts of power.

Page 204: Focus for profit

204

A laser can cut through steel.

Page 205: Focus for profit

205

Burn a hole in a diamond.

Page 206: Focus for profit

206

Burn your way into the mind.

Page 207: Focus for profit

207

What’s a Rolex?

Page 208: Focus for profit

208

What’s a Rolex?

Expensive Swiss watch.

Page 209: Focus for profit

209

The fastest-growing retailer.

Page 210: Focus for profit

210

What’s a Zara?

Fast fashion.

Page 211: Focus for profit

211

Resupply a store in 14 days.

The Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2001.

Page 212: Focus for profit

212

Sold in 27 different countries.

Page 213: Focus for profit

213

Fastest-growing American city?

Page 214: Focus for profit

214

The only city with one industry?

Page 215: Focus for profit

215

Las Vegas, Nevada.

Page 216: Focus for profit

216

You can’t stand for everything.

Page 217: Focus for profit

217

A brand should striveto own a word in the mind of the consumer.

The law of the word.

Page 218: Focus for profit

218

Volvo owns “safety.”

Page 219: Focus for profit

219

A Volvo looks safe.

Page 220: Focus for profit

220

A Ferrari looks dangerous.

Page 221: Focus for profit

221

When you own a word.

Safety.

Nobody can steal it.

Page 222: Focus for profit

222

Honda is trying.

Advertising Age, September 6, 2004.

Page 223: Focus for profit

223

A multi-million dollar campaign.

Page 224: Focus for profit

224

General Motors has tried.

Page 225: Focus for profit

225

12-page “safety” inserts.

Page 226: Focus for profit

226

The 10 safest cars in America.

Automotive News, December 5, 2005.

Page 227: Focus for profit

227

How many are Volvos?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

Page 228: Focus for profit

228

None.

Ford 500.

Saab 9-3.

Subaru Legacy.

Honda Civic.

Audi A3.

Audi A4.

Audi A6.

Chevrolet Malibu.

Volkswagen Jetta.

Volkswagen Passat.

Page 229: Focus for profit

229

Six Ragu varieties: 51%

Page 230: Focus for profit

230

Ragu market share: 37%

Page 231: Focus for profit

231

“Thicker” spaghetti sauce.

Page 232: Focus for profit

232

One variety: 27% share.

Page 233: Focus for profit

233

Curiously strong.

Page 234: Focus for profit

234

Memorable advertising.

Now the No. 1 peppermint brand.

Page 235: Focus for profit

235

“Natural” cosmetics.

Page 236: Focus for profit

236

$1.1 billion for the Body Shop.

The New York Times, January 4, 2006.

Page 237: Focus for profit

237

“Slippery.”

Page 238: Focus for profit

238

Movado: The museum watch.

Page 239: Focus for profit

239

Swatch: The fashion watch.

Page 240: Focus for profit

240

Zippo: The windproof lighter.

Page 241: Focus for profit

241

Most fitness clubs are unisex.

Page 242: Focus for profit

242

For women only.

America’s largest fitness chain.

Page 243: Focus for profit

243

What makes a movie star?

Page 244: Focus for profit

244

A man’s man.

John Wayne.

Page 245: Focus for profit

245

Sexy woman.

Marilyn Monroe.

Page 246: Focus for profit

246

Pretty woman.

Julia Roberts.

Page 247: Focus for profit

247

“Imprisoned in her archetype.”

“As many detours as Julia Roberts may take, she remains imprisoned in her archetype.”

Stephen Holden,The New York Times

Page 248: Focus for profit

248

Imprisoned at $20 million.

Page 249: Focus for profit

249

Bad boy.

Jack Nicholson.

Page 250: Focus for profit

250

Lovable cad.

Hugh Grant.

Page 251: Focus for profit

251

Action hero.

Tom Cruise.

Page 252: Focus for profit

252

The Governator.

Tough guy, Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Page 253: Focus for profit

253

The most powerful concept.

Word.

Page 254: Focus for profit

254

Volvo.

Safety.

Page 255: Focus for profit

255

BMW.

Driving.

Page 256: Focus for profit

256

Zara.

Fastfashion.

Page 257: Focus for profit

257

Prego spaghetti sauce.

Thick.

Page 258: Focus for profit

258

Altoids.

Couriouslystrong.

Page 259: Focus for profit

259

The Body Shop.

Natural.

Page 260: Focus for profit

260

The halo effect.

If you can own one attribute in the

mind, the prospect will give you many

others.

Page 261: Focus for profit

261

You can’t own everything.

Full line.High quality.Great service.

Low price.

Page 262: Focus for profit

262

But you can own a word.

Page 263: Focus for profit

263

An overcommunicated society.

The Brand of all brands

Page 264: Focus for profit

264

Reach everybody?

Exposureto an ad

Page 265: Focus for profit

265

Reach somebody that counts.

Page 266: Focus for profit

266

One great way to light the fire.

Page 267: Focus for profit

267

Cable TV.

Page 268: Focus for profit

268

Page 269: Focus for profit

269

Los consumidores son

DifEreNtes…

Por lo que se necesitan

estrategias diferentes…

Lo más contraproducente

es mantener el status quo

Colombia debe seguir los

nuevos ritmos del mercado

Recordemos que el panorama

de medios es diferente…

Page 270: Focus for profit

270

GRACIAS

www.lamac.org