DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

47
DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionale s de ayuda? Mario A. Núñez Molina

Transcript of DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Page 1: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum

de los profesionales

de ayuda?

Mario A. Núñez Molina

Page 2: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Reflexión

• “Los jueces de la normalidad están presentes en todas partes. Nos encontramos en compañía del profesor-juez, del médico-juez, del trabajador social-juez, todos hacen reinar la universalidad de lo normativo …”(Foucault)

Page 3: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

The Malleus Maleficarum (1486)

Page 4: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Las brujas

• Estimados de muerte durante la inquisición: 600,000 to as high as 9,000,000 (over its 250 year long course);

• Casi todas las acusadas eran mujeres.

Page 5: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Kreisman y el DSM

• Jerold Kreisman says, "Well, all psychiatric diagnoses, these days, are defined very clearly in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. And, every few years, wise psychiatrists go up to Mount Sinai, talk to God, and define all psychiatric illnesses. If you're a manic-depressive, you have three out of these five or four out of these seven. Borderline Personality Disorder is defined by having five out of the eight criteria." There was, once upon a time, another book from which this kind of scientific certainty was derived. It was the Malleus Maleficarum. The certainty then was about who was a witch.

– 'Paula J. Caplan;Lisa Cosgrove. Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Kindle Locations 1529-1532). Kindle Edition.

Page 6: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

DSM

Page 7: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Criticas al DSM: Conflict-of-Interest Disorder

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21580-many-authors-of-psychiatry-bible-have-industry-ties.html

Page 8: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

William Glasser

• “The DSM was not written to help people; it was developed to help psychiatrists – to help them make money.”

Page 9: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Conflicto de intereses

• Al presente, un 69% de los miembros del task force del DSM-5 tienen lazos con la industria farmaceútica.

• Of the 137 DSM-V panel members (that is, workgroup members) who have posted disclosure statements, 77 (56 percent) reported industry ties, such as holding stock in pharmaceutical companies, serving as consultants to industry, or serving on company boards

– http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001190

Page 10: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Eli Lilly

• Whitaker writes that in the first quarter of 2009 alone, Eli Lilly gave $551,000 to NAMI [National Alliance on Mental Illness] and its local chapters, $465,000 to the National Mental Health Association, $130,000 to CHADD (an ADHD [attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder] patient-advocacy group), and $69,250 to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.

– http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jul/14/illusions-of-psychiatry/?pagination=false

Page 11: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Conflicto de intereses

• 15 per cent of the work group members were speakers' bureau members.

– http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21580-many-authors-of-psychiatry-bible-have-industry-ties.html

Page 12: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

La transparencia no es suficiente

• However, transparency alone cannot mitigate bias. Because industry relationships can create a “pro-industry habit of thought” , having financial ties to industry such as honoraria, consultation, or grant funding is as pernicious a problem as speaker's bureau participation.

• http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001190

Page 13: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

No se habla de los efectos secundarios

• Attention to adverse side effects of medications is virtually nonexistent. Previous editions of the DSM, including the latest text revision published in 2000, glossed over the side effects of psychotropic medications. Only two of more than seven hundred pages of the main body of the DSM-IV-Text Revision deal with diagnosing side effects of psychotropic medication

– http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2010/ND/feat/cosg.htm (Cosgrove)

Page 14: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Efectos secundarios

• A typical patient, he says, might be taking Celexa for depression, Ativan for anxiety, Ambien for insomnia, Provigil for fatigue (a side effect of Celexa), and Viagra for impotence (another side effect of Celexa).

Page 15: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Prejuicios en los procesos de diagnosticar

Page 16: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Clase social y sicopatología

• The "higher" the social class, the less likely an individual was to become a psychiatric patient of any kind; people in Classes IV and V combined were 2 1/2 times as likely as people in Classes I and II to enter psychiatric treatment,

– Paula J. Caplan;Lisa Cosgrove. Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Kindle Locations 205-206). Kindle Edition.

Page 17: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Mecanismo de control social

• Thus, diagnosis is a mechanism of social control. It could do harm, or it could help, but in either case it is a mechanism of social control.

• Paula J. Caplan;Lisa Cosgrove. Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Kindle Locations 302-303). Kindle Edition.

Page 18: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Page 19: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

"Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder" (PMDD)

• “PMDD was represented to the public initially by Eli Lilly and later by other pharmaceutical companies as a "distinct medical condition.”

– Paula J. Caplan;Lisa Cosgrove. Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Kindle Locations 2872-2873). Kindle Edition.

Page 20: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Anuncio de Eli Lilly

• "PMDD affects millions of women.... but the good news is that your doctor can treat PMDD symptoms with a new treatment called Sarafem" (Eli Lilly advertisement 2001).

– Paula J. Caplan;Lisa Cosgrove. Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Kindle Locations 2891-2892). Kindle Edition.

Page 21: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Sarafem-Prozac

• What women were not told in these ads is that the psychotropic medication produced by Eli Lilly to treat PMDD is Prozac, which had been relabeled as Sarafem and manufactured in pink and lavender capsules.

• Paula J. Caplan;Lisa Cosgrove. Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Kindle Locations 2892-2894).

Page 22: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Video Sarafem

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TPtuPt_5Uc&feature=related

Page 23: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

FDA

• It is noteworthy that, in December 2000, the FDA sent a warning letter to Eli Lilly, mandating that Lilly cease using this ad for the following reasons: “The imagery and audio presentation of the advertisement never completely define or accurately illustrate premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and there is no clear distinction between premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and PMDD communicated. . . . The advertisement is lacking fair balance because the graphics accompanying the audio presentation of the risk information are very distracting and minimize the important risk information.” (Emphasis added.)

– http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2010/ND/feat/cosg.htm

Page 24: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Beneficios para la industria

• It was reported that in the first six months after the FDA approved fluoxetine hydrochloride to treat the unproven entity called Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD), 2.5 million prescriptions for the drug were written.

• Paula J. Caplan;Lisa Cosgrove. Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis (Kindle Locations 3200-3201). Kindle Edition.

Page 25: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Tratamiento natural

• eating smaller, more frequent meals to limit blood-sugar fluctuations;

• cutting back on white flour and sugar intake (which cause blood sugar levels to spike);

• and exercising regularly. Even a brisk 20- to 30-minute walk three times a week, increases mood-boosting serotonin levels, and helps with fluid retention and food cravings. Nutritional supplements like calcium, [B.sub.6] and magnesium also may help.

• http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0846/is_9_21/ai_84599102/

Page 26: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Medicalización de la normalidad

Page 27: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Major depressive disorder

• DSM 5 would encourage the diagnosis of 'Major Depressive Disorder' almost immediately after the loss of a loved one—having just 2 weeks of sadness and loss of interest along with reduced appetite, sleep, and energy would earn the MDD label (and all too often an unnecessary and potentially harmful pill treatment).

Page 28: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

La pena como depresión mayor

• For example, take the case of a man whose spouse unexpectedly dies. For two weeks after the death, he feels sad, doesn't want to go to work, loses his appetite, has trouble sleeping and concentrating. Currently, this is normal grief. The DSM 5 suggestion would have this be major depression.

Page 29: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Epidemias creadas artificialmente

• Ten percent of ten-year-old boys now take daily stimulants for ADHD—”attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder”—and 500,000 children take antipsychotic drugs. (se ha triplicado el número en los últimos quince años)

Page 30: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

• Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. There are 4 suggestions for DSM5 that would make this existing overdiagnosis much worse.– •The first change is to raise the required age of

onset from 7 to 12.•The second is to allow the diagnosis based only on the presence of symptoms, not requiring impairment. •The third is to reduce by half the number of symptoms required for adults.

Page 31: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

• We don't have more attention deficit than ever before-we just label more attentional problems as mental disorder. (Allen Frances)

Page 32: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Otros nuevos desordenes problemáticos

Page 33: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

MND

Page 34: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

MNC

• Minor Neurocognitive Disorder is defined by nonspecific symptoms of reduced cognitive performance that are very common (perhaps almost ubiquitous) in people over fifty.

Page 35: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Binge eating disorder

Page 36: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder

Page 37: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder

• Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder is one of the most dangerous and poorly conceived suggestions for DSM5―a misguided medicalization of temper outbursts. The “diagnosis” would be very common at every age in the general population and would promote a large expansion in the use of antipsychotic medications.

Page 38: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Paraphilic coercive disorder

Page 39: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

• Paraphilic Coercive Disorder would expand the pool of sex offenders who are eligible for indefinite civil commitment because they have a “mental disorder” to include cases of sexual coercion.

Page 40: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Internet use disorder

Page 41: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

• Diagnosis of "mental illness" is more an art than a science. DSM-based research has repeatedly shown very poor reliability and, therefore, questionable validity. In a 2005 interview, Robert Spitzer, the architect of the DSM, confessed candidly: "To say that we've solved the reliability problem is just not true. . . It's been improved. But if you're in a situation with a general clinician it's certainly not very good" (Spiegel, 2005, p. 63)

Page 42: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Patologización de la normalidad

• DSM5 would create tens of millions of newly misidentified false positive “patients,” thus greatly exacerbating the problems caused already by an overly inclusive DSM4.7 There would be massive overtreatment with medications that are unnecessary, expensive, and often quite harmful. DSM5 appears to be promoting what we have most feared--the inclusion of many normal variants under the rubric of mental illness, with the result that the core concept of "mental disorder" is greatly undermined. (Frances)

Page 43: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Occupy American Psychiatric Association

Page 44: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Referencias• A MOMENT OF CRISIS IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN PSYCHIATRY.

(n.d.).h-madness. Retrieved from http://historypsychiatry.com/2010/04/27/a-moment-of-crisis-in-the-history-of-american-psychiatry/

• Angell, M. (2004). The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It (1st ed.). Random House.

• Caplan, P. J., & Cosgrove, L. (Eds.). (2004). Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis. Jason Aronson, Inc.

• Carlat, D. (2010). Unhinged: The Trouble with Psychiatry - A Doctor’s Revelations about a Profession in Crisis (1st ed.). Free Press.

• Cosgrove, L., & Krimsky, S. (2012). A Comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Panel Members’ Financial Associations with Industry: A Pernicious Problem Persists. PLoS Med, 9(3), e1001190. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001190

Page 45: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

• Horwitz, A. V. (2003). Creating Mental Illness (1st ed.). University Of Chicago Press.

• Kutchins, H. (1997). Making Us Crazy. Free Press.• Opening Pandora’s Box: The 19 Worst Suggestions For DSM5 -

Psychiatric Times. (n.d.). Retrieved May 2, 2012, from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/print/article/10168/1522341

• Watters, E. (2010). Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche. Free Press.

• Whitaker, R. (2010). Mad in America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and the Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill (Second ed.). Basic Books.

• Whitaker, R. (2011). Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America (1st ed.). Broadway.

Page 46: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Referencias

• http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx • http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dsm5/ • http://www.diigo.com/user/digizen/dsm

Page 47: DSM: ¿la biblia o el malleus mallefiracum de los profesionales de ayuda?

Comunicate

• Email: [email protected]• Blog: http://www.vidadigital.net/blog• Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/digizen