Marie-Fran˘coise Daza, Laurent Ariza: El amor en los tiempos del … · 2020-06-04 ·...

Marie-Francoise Daza, Laurent Ariza: El amor en los tiempos del coronavirus

Marie-Francoise Daza,

Laurent Ariza:

El amor

en los tiempos del coronavirus

LUCIO BOCCARDO

(Sapienza Universita di Roma - Istituto Lombardo)

Singular Problems Associated to Quasilinear Equations

Singular ProblemsAssociated to QuasilinearEquationsA WORKSHOP IN CELEBRATION OF MARIE-FRANÇOISE BIDAUT-VÉRONAND LAURENT VÉRON’S 70TH BIRTHDAY.

June 1-3, 2020

The workshop will take place

over Zoom.

Organizers:

Quoc-Hung Nguyen, ShanghaiTech University

Phuoc-Tai Nguyen, Masaryk University

Speakers

The workshop is co-hosted by Institute of

Mathematical Sciences, ShanghaiTech University

and Department of Mathematics and Statistics,

Masaryk University.

Lucio Boccardo, UNIROMA1, Italy.

Huyuan Chen, JXNU, China.

Julián López Gómez, UCM, Spain.

Manuel Del Pino, Univ. of Bath, UK

Jesús Ildefonso Díaz, UCM, Spain.

Marta García-Huidobro, UC, Chile.

Moshe Marcus, Technion, Israel.

Giuseppe Mingione, UNIPR, Italy.

Vitaly Moroz, Swansea University, UK.

Nguyen Cong Phuc, LSU, USA.

Van Tien Nguyen, NYU, Abu Dhabi.

Alessio Porretta, UNIROMA2, Italy.

Patrizia Pucci, UNIPG, Italy.

Philippe Souplet, LAGA, France

Igor Verbitsky, Univ. of Missouri, USA.

Juan Luis Vázquez, UAM, Spain.

Feng Zhou, ECNU, China.

A WORKSHOP IN CELEBRATION OF MARIE-FRANCOISEBIDAUT-VERON AND LAURENT VERON’S 70TH BIRTHDAY.

Bonjour

Buon giorno

Good morning

+thanks to the organizers

Bonjour

Buon giorno

Good morning

Bonjour

Buon giorno

Good morning

El amor en los tiempos del coronavirus

G.G.M.

L’amour aux temps du corona

Les mathematiques aux temps du corona

1 . 6 . 2020

Bon anniversaire

1 . 6 . 2020

Bon anniversaire

1 . 6 . 2020

Bon anniversaire

1 . 6 . 2020

Bon anniversaire

Maximum principle

Two maximum principles for two friends

Maximum principle

A remark dedicated to Marie-Francoise, by David A. and Lucio B. / following [AB,JFA 2014]

Maximum principle

Ω bounded open subset of RN

M(x) bounded elliptic matrix

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0sketch:

Th(Gk(s))/h

−k − h

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

Th(Gk(s))/h

−k − h

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

Th(Gk(s))/h

−k − h

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

sketch:

Th(Gk(s))/h

−k − h

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

Th(Gk(s))/h

−k − h

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

Th(Gk(s))/h

−k − h

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

sketch :

|∇Gk(un)|2 +

an(x)|un|γ|Gk(un)|

≤∫

|fn||Gk(un)| ≤∫

Q an(x)|Gk(un)|

⇒posit. +

an(x)[|un|γ − Q]|Gk(un)| ≤ 0

⇒|un| ≤ Q1γ ...⇒... ∃ |u| ≤ Q

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

sketch : α

|∇Gk(un)|2 +

an(x)|un|γ|Gk(un)|

≤∫

|fn||Gk(un)| ≤∫

Q an(x)|Gk(un)|

⇒posit. +

an(x)[|un|γ − Q]|Gk(un)| ≤ 0

⇒|un| ≤ Q1γ ...⇒... ∃ |u| ≤ Q

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

sketch : α

|∇Gk(un)|2 +

an(x)|un|γ|Gk(un)|

≤∫

|fn||Gk(un)| ≤∫

Q an(x)|Gk(un)|

posit. +

an(x)[|un|γ − Q]|Gk(un)| ≤ 0

⇒|un| ≤ Q1γ ...⇒... ∃ |u| ≤ Q

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω)

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

sketch : α

|∇Gk(un)|2 +

an(x)|un|γ|Gk(un)|

≤∫

|fn||Gk(un)| ≤∫

Q an(x)|Gk(un)|

⇒posit. +

an(x)[|un|γ − Q]|Gk(un)| ≤ 0

⇒|un| ≤ Q1γ ...⇒... ∃ |u| ≤ Q

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

∃ : u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω), |u| ≤ Q

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

f=Q a: −div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)uγ =Q a(x), γ > 0

−div(M(x)∇u)=a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ T1a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ 0⇒⇒u satisfies Strong Maximum Principle,even if 0 < γ < 1.

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

∃ : u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω), |u| ≤ Q

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

f=Q a:

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)uγ =Q a(x), γ > 0

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

∃ : u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω), |u| ≤ Q

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

∃ : u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω), |u| ≤ Q

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

−div(M(x)∇u)=a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ T1a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ 0

⇒⇒u satisfies Strong Maximum Principle,even if 0 < γ < 1.

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

∃ : u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω), |u| ≤ Q

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

−div(M(x)∇u)=a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ T1a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ 0⇒⇒

u satisfies Strong Maximum Principle,even if 0 < γ < 1.

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

∃ : u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω), |u| ≤ Q

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

−div(M(x)∇u)=a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ T1a(x)[Q − uγ] ≥ 0⇒⇒u satisfies Strong Maximum Principle,

even if 0 < γ < 1.

Maximum principle

|f (x)| ≤ Q a(x) ∈ L1(Ω), Q > 0

∃ : u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ L∞(Ω), |u| ≤ Q

−div(M(x)∇u)+a(x)u|u|γ−1 = f , γ > 0

First Maximum Principle, dedicated to Marie-Francoise

Lower order term: Convection/Drift terms

We discuss the existence properties and of distributionalsolutions for the boundary value problems (the firstwith a convection term, the second with a drift term)

−div(M(x)∇u) = −div(u E (x)) + f (x) in Ω,

u = 0 on ∂Ω,−div(M(x)∇ψ) = E (x)∇ψ + g(x) in Ω,

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,

We note that

at least formally, if M(x) is symmetric, the twoabove linear problems are in duality.

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,

We note that

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,

We note that

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,

We note that

Coercivity

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,

We note that

the differential operators may be not coercive,unless one assumes that either the norm of |E | inLN(Ω) is small, or that div(‖E‖

N) = 0: ...

Coercivity

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,

We note that

N) = 0: ...

Coercivity

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,

We note that

N) = 0: ...

Coercivity

Papers concerned with this part of the talk

L. Boccardo: Some developments on Dirichlet problemswith discontinuous coefficients; Boll. Unione Mat. Ital, 2(2009) 285–297.(invited paper in memory of 30-death Stampacchia)

L. Boccardo: Dirichlet problems with singularconvection terms and applications; J. DifferentialEquations, 258 (2015) 2290–2314.

L. Boccardo: Stampacchia-Calderon-Zygmund theoryfor linear elliptic equations with discontinuouscoefficients and singular drift; ESAIM, Control,Optimization and Calculus of Variations, 25 (2019), Art.47, 13 pp.

Coercivity

Assumptions

−div(M(x)∇u)) = −div(u E (x)) + f (x) : Ω,

u = 0 : ∂Ω.

Ω bounded subset of RN ,

ellipticity: 0 < α, α|ξ|2 ≤ M(x)ξξ, |M(x)|1 ≤ β,

f ∈ Lm(Ω), 1 ≤ m ≤ ∞,

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

1 1: dependence w.r.t. x / 2: nonsmooth dependence /Mingione

Coercivity

Assumptions

u = 0 : ∂Ω.

ellipticity:

0 < α, α|ξ|2 ≤ M(x)ξξ, |M(x)|1 ≤ β,

f ∈ Lm(Ω), 1 ≤ m ≤ ∞,

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

Coercivity

Assumptions

u = 0 : ∂Ω.

f ∈ Lm(Ω), 1 ≤ m ≤ ∞,

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

Coercivity

Assumptions

u = 0 : ∂Ω.

f ∈ Lm(Ω), 1 ≤ m ≤ ∞,

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

Coercivity

Boundary value problem and Lax-Milgram

u weak /distributional solution of the boundary valueproblem

−div(M(x)∇u)) = −div(u E (x)) + f (x) : Ω,u = 0 : ∂Ω.

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

M(x)∇u∇v =

u E (x)∇v +

f (x)v ,

∀ v ∈ W 1,20 (Ω)/smooth

Coercivity

u weak

/distributional solution of the boundary valueproblem

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

M(x)∇u∇v =

u E (x)∇v +

f (x)v ,

∀ v ∈ W 1,20 (Ω)/smooth

Coercivity

u weak /distributional

solution of the boundary valueproblem

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

M(x)∇u∇v =

u E (x)∇v +

f (x)v ,

∀ v ∈ W 1,20 (Ω)/smooth

Coercivity

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

M(x)∇u∇v =

u E (x)∇v +

f (x)v ,

∀ v ∈ W 1,20 (Ω)

/smooth

Coercivity

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

M(x)∇u∇v =

u E (x)∇v +

f (x)v ,

∀ v ∈ W 1,20 (Ω)/smooth

Coercivity

Coercivity of −div(M(x)∇u) + div(u E(x))

M(x)∇v∇v ±∫

v E (x)∇v

≥ α

|∇v |2 −[ ∫

|v |2∗] 1

2∗[ ∫

|E (x)|N] 1

N[ ∫

|∇v |2] 1

≥α− 1

[ ∫Ω

|E (x)|N] 1

|∇v |2

E ∈ LN

‖E‖LN

not too large

Coercivity

M(x)∇v∇v ±∫

v E (x)∇v

≥ α

|∇v |2 −[ ∫

|v |2∗] 1

2∗[ ∫

|E (x)|N] 1

N[ ∫

|∇v |2] 1

≥α− 1

[ ∫Ω

|E (x)|N] 1

|∇v |2

E ∈ LN

‖E‖LN

not too large

Coercivity

M(x)∇v∇v ±∫

v E (x)∇v

≥ α

|∇v |2 −[ ∫

|v |2∗] 1

2∗[ ∫

|E (x)|N] 1

N[ ∫

|∇v |2] 1

≥α− 1

[ ∫Ω

|E (x)|N] 1

|∇v |2

E ∈ LN

‖E‖LN

not too large

Coercivity

M(x)∇v∇v ±∫

v E (x)∇v

≥ α

|∇v |2 −[ ∫

|v |2∗] 1

2∗[ ∫

|E (x)|N] 1

N[ ∫

|∇v |2] 1

≥α− 1

[ ∫Ω

|E (x)|N] 1

|∇v |2

E ∈ LN

‖E‖LN

not too large

Coercivity

M(x)∇v∇v ±∫

v E (x)∇v

≥ α

|∇v |2 −[ ∫

|v |2∗] 1

2∗[ ∫

|E (x)|N] 1

N[ ∫

|∇v |2] 1

≥α− 1

[ ∫Ω

|E (x)|N] 1

|∇v |2

E ∈ LN

‖E‖LN

not too large

Coercivity

M(x)∇v∇v ±∫

v E (x)∇v

≥ α

|∇v |2 −[ ∫

|v |2∗] 1

2∗[ ∫

|E (x)|N] 1

N[ ∫

|∇v |2] 1

≥α− 1

[ ∫Ω

|E (x)|N] 1

|∇v |2

E ∈ LN

‖E‖LN

not too large

Coercivity

Our approach hinges on test function method

The proofs of all the results are very easy

if we assume div(E ) = 0

if we assume ‖E‖N

Coercivity

Our approach hinges on test function method

The proofs of all the results are very easy

if we assume div(E ) = 0

if we assume ‖E‖N

Existence of weak/distributional solutions. Summability properties of solutions

Stampacchia-Calderon-Zygmund for the two problems

u = 0 on ∂Ω,2

−div(M(x)∇ψ) = E (x)∇ψ + g(x) in Ω,

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,3

Ω bounded subset of RN ,ellipticity: 0 < α, α|ξ|2 ≤ M(x)ξξ, |M(x)| ≤ β,f ∈ Lm(Ω), 1 ≤ m ≤ ∞,

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

and we prove for both the b.v.p. the sameStampacchia-Calderon-Zygmund results of the caseE = 0 .

2 paper invitation U.M.I. in memory of 30-Stampacchia3 ESAIM-COCV 2019

Stampacchia-Calderon-Zygmund for the two problems−div(M(x)∇u) = −div(u E (x)) + f (x) in Ω,

u = 0 on ∂Ω,2

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,3

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

u = 0 on ∂Ω,2

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,3

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

u = 0 on ∂Ω,2

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,3

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

and we prove for both the b.v.p. the sameStampacchia-Calderon-Zygmund results of the case

E = 0 .

u = 0 on ∂Ω,2

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,3

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

as E = 0

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

as E = 0

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

as E = 0

u = 0 : ∂Ω

1 2NN+2≤ m < N

2⇒ u ∈ W 1,2

0 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);2 1 < m < 2N

N+2⇒ u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);3 m = 1 ⇒ u ∈ W 1,q

0 (Ω), q < NN−1

M∇u∇φ =

u E∇φ +

f φ, ∀φ ∈ D.

Theorem (70-Brezis)

E = 0, m > N2

, it is false that u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω)

Remark

E = 0, 2NN+2

+ δMeyers < m < N2

, u ∈?

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

as E = 0−div(M(x)∇u)) = −div(u E (x)) + f (x) : Ω,

u = 0 : ∂Ω

1 2NN+2≤ m < N

2⇒ u ∈ W 1,2

0 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);

2 1 < m < 2NN+2⇒ u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);3 m = 1 ⇒ u ∈ W 1,q

0 (Ω), q < NN−1

M∇u∇φ =

u E∇φ +

f φ, ∀φ ∈ D.

Theorem (70-Brezis)

E = 0, m > N2

0 (Ω)

Remark

E = 0, 2NN+2

+ δMeyers < m < N2

, u ∈?

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

u = 0 : ∂Ω

1 2NN+2≤ m < N

2⇒ u ∈ W 1,2

0 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);2 1 < m < 2N

N+2⇒ u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);3 m = 1

⇒ u ∈ W 1,q0 (Ω), q < N

N−1.

M∇u∇φ =

u E∇φ +

f φ, ∀φ ∈ D.

Theorem (70-Brezis)

E = 0, m > N2

0 (Ω)

Remark

E = 0, 2NN+2

+ δMeyers < m < N2

, u ∈?

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

u = 0 : ∂Ω

1 2NN+2≤ m < N

2⇒ u ∈ W 1,2

0 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);2 1 < m < 2N

N+2⇒ u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);3 m = 1 ⇒ u ∈ W 1,q

0 (Ω), q < NN−1

M∇u∇φ =

u E∇φ +

f φ, ∀φ ∈ D.

Theorem (70-Brezis)

E = 0, m > N2

0 (Ω)

Remark

E = 0, 2NN+2

+ δMeyers < m < N2

, u ∈?

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

u = 0 : ∂Ω

1 2NN+2≤ m < N

2⇒ u ∈ W 1,2

0 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);2 1 < m < 2N

N+2⇒ u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);3 m = 1 ⇒ u ∈ W 1,q

0 (Ω), q < NN−1

M∇u∇φ =

u E∇φ +

f φ, ∀φ ∈ D.

Theorem (70-Brezis)

E = 0, m > N2

0 (Ω)

Remark

E = 0, 2NN+2

+ δMeyers < m < N2

, u ∈?

|E | ∈ LN(Ω)

u = 0 : ∂Ω

1 2NN+2≤ m < N

2⇒ u ∈ W 1,2

0 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);2 1 < m < 2N

N+2⇒ u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);3 m = 1 ⇒ u ∈ W 1,q

0 (Ω), q < NN−1

M∇u∇φ =

u E∇φ +

f φ, ∀φ ∈ D.

Theorem (70-Brezis)

E = 0, m > N2

0 (Ω)

Remark

E = 0, 2NN+2

+ δMeyers < m < N2

, u ∈?

Same results for the drift problem

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,4

4 ESAIM-COCV 2019

Same results for the drift problem

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,4

4 ESAIM-COCV 2019

“Nonlinear”

approach to a linear problem

−div(M(x)∇un) = −div( un

1 + 1n|un|

E (x))

+ f (x)

“Nonlinear”

approach to a linear problem

1 + 1n|un|

E (x))

+ f (x)

“Nonlinear” approach to a linear problem

1 + 1n|un|

E (x))

+ f (x)

Other recent papers

L. Boccardo, S. Buccheri, G.R. Cirmi: Two linear noncoerciveDirichlet problems in duality; Milan J. Math. 86 (2018),97–104.

L. Boccardo, S. Buccheri, R.G. Cirmi: Calderon-Zygmundtheory for infinite energy solutions of nonlinear ellipticequations with singular drift; NODEA, to appear.

L. Boccardo, S. Buccheri: A nonlinear homotopy between twolinear Dirichlet problems; Rev. Mat. Complutense, to appear.

L. Boccardo: Two semilinear Dirichlet problems “almost” induality; Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. 12 (2019), 349–356.

L. Boccardo, L. Orsina, A. Porretta: Some noncoerciveparabolic equations with lower order terms in divergence form.Dedicated to Philippe Benilan. J. Evol. Equ. 3 (2003),407–418.

(((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

If E 6∈ (LN(Ω))N , even for nothing, as in

|E | ≤ |A||x | , A ∈ R , 0 ∈ Ω,

the framework changes completely:u ∈W 1,2

0 (Ω) or u ∈W 1,q0 (Ω) depends on the size of A . 5

1) if |A| < α(N−2m)m

, and 2NN+2≤ m < N

2, then

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);

2) if |A| < α(N−2m)m

, and 1 < m < 2NN+2

, then

u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);

3) if |A| < α(N − 2), and m = 1, then ∇u ∈ (MN

N−1 (Ω))N

and u ∈ W 1,q0 (Ω), for every q < N

N−1;

4) if α(N − 2) ≤ |A| < α(N − 1), then u ∈ W 1,q0 (Ω), for

every q < Nα|A|+α

5JDE 2015; +Orsina, Nonlin.Anal. 2019

(((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

|E | ≤ |A||x | , A ∈ R , 0 ∈ Ω,

1) if |A| < α(N−2m)m

, and 2NN+2≤ m < N

2, then

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);

2) if |A| < α(N−2m)m

, and 1 < m < 2NN+2

, then

u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);

N−1 (Ω))N

N−1;

every q < Nα|A|+α

(((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

|E | ≤ |A||x | , A ∈ R , 0 ∈ Ω,

1) if |A| < α(N−2m)m

, and 2NN+2≤ m < N

2, then

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) ∩ Lm∗∗(Ω);

2) if |A| < α(N−2m)m

, and 1 < m < 2NN+2

, then

u ∈ W 1,m∗

0 (Ω);

N−1 (Ω))N

N−1;

every q < Nα|A|+α

(((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

Radial ex.

(((((((((((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

E ∈ (L2(Ω))N

definition of solution;

existence of solution.6

6 JDE 2015

(((((((((((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

E ∈ (L2(Ω))N definition of solution;

existence of solution.6

6 JDE 2015

(((((((((((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

If we add the zero order term “+u”, the framework changes completely.

A , un ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

−div(M(x)∇un) + A un = −div( un

1 + 1n|un|

E (x))

+ f (x)

Simpler proofs

PhD course, UCM, November 2019

(((((((((((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

A , un ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

1 + 1n|un|

E (x))

+ f (x)

Simpler proofs

(((((((((((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

A , un ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

1 + 1n|un|

E (x))

+ f (x)

Simpler proofs

course, UCM, November 2019

(((((((((((((E ∈ (LN (Ω))N

A , un ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) :

1 + 1n|un|

E (x))

+ f (x)

Simpler proofs

Impact of a zero order term

By duality: problems with very singular drifts

−div(M(x)∇ψ) + ψ = E (x)∇ψ + g(x) in Ω,

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,7

E ∈ L2 8, f bounded ⇒ u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω), bounded;

application to the existence in some Hamilton-J.eq. with lower order term having q-dependencew.r.t. gradient, q < 2.

7 DIE 20198 only L2

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,7

7 DIE 20198 only L2

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,7

7 DIE 20198 only L2

ψ = 0 on ∂Ω,7

7 DIE 20198 only L2

An elliptic system connected with the mathematical study of PDE models forchemotaxis

−div(A(x)∇u) + u = −div(u M(x)∇ψ) + f (x) ,−div(M(x)∇ψ) = uθ .

9JDE 201510Comm.PDE + L. Orsina

An elliptic system connected with the mathematical study of PDE models forchemotaxis

−div(A(x)∇u) + u = −div(u M(x)∇ψ) + f (x) ,−div(M(x)∇ψ) = uθ .

9JDE 201510Comm.PDE + L. Orsina

Convection [L.B. 2020]

u = 0 : ∂Ω

E , f ∈ ?

Theorem

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N , f ∈ Lm(Ω) with m ≥ 2NN+2

and f (x) ≥ 0 (of

course not zero a.e.). Then the solution u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) is

positive and it is zero at most on a set of zeroLebesgue measure a.

a weak max. pr.

Remark

In the proof we only need E ∈ (L2(Ω))N : blue and redassumptions.

u = 0 : ∂Ω

E , f ∈

Theorem

and f (x) ≥ 0 (of

a weak max. pr.

Remark

u = 0 : ∂Ω

E , f ∈ ?

Theorem

and f (x) ≥ 0 (of

a weak max. pr.

Remark

u = 0 : ∂Ω

E , f ∈ ?

Theorem

and f (x) ≥ 0 (of

a weak max. pr.

Remark

u = 0 : ∂Ω

E , f ∈ ?

Theorem

and f (x) ≥ 0 (of

a weak max. pr.

Remark

Drift [L.B. 2020]

−div(M(x)∇ψ)) = −div(ψ E (x)) + g(x) : Ω,

ψ = 0 : ∂Ω

Theorem

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N , g ∈ Lm(Ω) with m ≥ 2NN+2

and g(x) ≥ 0 (of

a weak max. pr.

Remark

Drift [L.B. 2020]

−div(M(x)∇ψ)) = −div(ψ E (x)) + g(x) : Ω,

ψ = 0 : ∂Ω

Theorem

E ∈ (LN(Ω))N , g ∈ Lm(Ω) with m ≥ 2NN+2

and g(x) ≥ 0 (of

a weak max. pr.

Remark

Second Maximum principle, dedicated to Laurent [L.B. - Luigi Orsina, Advanced Nonlinear Sudies, 2020]

with Alberto Farina

in a conference in Cortona (organizers Juan Luis and Lucio)

Calculus of Variations (in the study of integral functionals)

Recall this large and important class of integralfunctionals

J(v) =1

A(x , v)|∇v |2 +λ

v 2 −∫

f v λ > 0.

The Euler-Lagrange equation for J is (at least formally)the quasilinear elliptic problem−div(A(x , u)∇u) + 1

2A′(x , u)|∇u|2 + λ u = f in Ω,

u = 0 on ∂Ω.

J(v) =1

A(x , v)|∇v |2 +λ

v 2 −∫

f v λ > 0.

2A′(x , u)|∇u|2 + λ u = f in Ω,

u = 0 on ∂Ω.

J(v) =1

A(x , v)|∇v |2 +λ

v 2 −∫

f v λ > 0.

2A′(x , u)|∇u|2 + λ u = f in Ω,

u = 0 on ∂Ω.

Quasilinear Dirichlet problems having l.o.t. with natural growth

Background

Consider the Dirichlet problem

u ∈ W 1,20 (Ω) : −div([a(x)+|u|q]∇u)+λ u+b(x) u|u|p−1|∇u|2 = f (x)

Existence [+several friends],

Existence with regularizing effect [B-Gallouet],

(L.B. dedicated to 60-Laurent).

Theorem (Weak Maximum Principle / easy )

If f ≥ 0, then the weak solution u is such that u ≥ 0almost everywhere in Ω.

Background

Existence with

regularizing effect [B-Gallouet],

Background

Theorem (Weak Maximum Principle /

easy )

Background

Theorem (Weak Maximum Principle / easy

Background

pour Laurent

even with f(x) very singular

Theorem (Strong Maximum Principle)

If f ≥ 0 (and not almost everywhere equal to zero),then for every set ω ⊂⊂ Ω there exists mω > 0 such thatu(x) ≥ mω almost everywhere in ω.

pour Laurent

Next future

to MARIE-F. and LAURENT

Next future

je vous souhaite tous le bien

without

Next future

without

Next future

without

Thanks

Marie-Fran˘coise Daza, Laurent Ariza: El amor en los tiempos del … · 2020-06-04 ·...

Documents

Transcript of Marie-Fran˘coise Daza, Laurent Ariza: El amor en los tiempos del … · 2020-06-04 ·...

Francisco flores daza

STEPHANYE ARIZA MARTÍNEZ

Presentación Emprendimiento Sena Konor & Laurent Sas

Jugant amb la lluna - Laurent Laveder

Trabajo icc sully daza

Inclumat Daza

Miguel Ariza** - SciELO

Laurent Giles CYPSELA - Cosas De Barcos · Laurent Giles CYPSELA Velero de crucero (1953) Laurent Giles CYPSELA € 79.000 € Datos básicos Tipo: Velero de crucero Año: 1953 Eslora:

Lecciones de cine - Laurent Tirard.pdf

Éric Laurent

Cultura digital (daza)

GINNA DAZA TE AMO

Lecciones de cine/Laurent Tirard

Laurent Tirard - Lecciones de Cine

Laurent Fièvre

Laurent Schlider

Laurent Laganier

PIERRE LAURENT AIMARD - Auditorio Nacional

Daza Salas Jasmin

WANNABE FAUNO - Laurent Delomlaurentdelom.com/Laurent Delom - Wannabe Fauno... · WANNABE FAUNO es un solo de danza creado por el bailarín y coreógrafo francés Laurent Delom. Toma